Establishing quality standards for graduate entry master of nursing curricula in Australia and New Zealand: A Delphi study

被引:3
作者
Gerdtz, Marie F. [1 ]
Seaton, Philippa [2 ]
Jones, Virginia [2 ]
Tomkins, Zerina [1 ]
Stacey, Gemma [3 ]
Brooks, Ingrid Ann [4 ]
Kapp, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, 161 Barry St, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Otago, Div Hlth Sci, Ctr Postgrad Nursing Studies, 72 Oxford Terrace, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[3] Florence Nightingale Fdn, 10-18 Union St, London SE1 1SZ, England
[4] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Nursing & Midwifery, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Nursing education; Graduate masters programme; Delphi study; Standards; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103151
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To describe the common elements of Graduate Entry Master of Nursing curricula and identify a set of standards and quality indicators for benchmarking purposes within and across jurisdictions. Background: Internationally, there has been an increase in universities offering Graduate Entry Masters programs in Nursing. Such programs specify a bachelor degree as an entry requirement and then offer an intensive program of study that prepares graduates for registration as a nurse. To date, no formal standards exist to guide evaluation of these curricula. Design: A two phased sequential mixed-methods design comprising thematic content analysis of curricula and a Delphi study. The setting was the Australian and New Zealand tertiary education sectors. Participants were nurse academics who were recruited to participate in the Delphi study. Quota sampling was used to identify educators from the education providers meeting organisational inclusion criteria (program coordinator and one lecturer working as a subject coordinator of the program) and nominated by their Head of Department. Methods: Phase One of the study involved a thematic analysis of the curricula of nine Graduate Entry Master of Nursing programs to identify common elements of curricula and domains of quality. In Phase Two these themes were used in a series of Delphi rounds to identify a set of agreed quality domains, statements and indicators. Results: Participants (n = 16) responded over three Delphi rounds. A total of nine domains of quality were determined, a set of 26 quality statements were identified based on the acceptance threshold of > 75% level of agreement and 27 quality indicators were established. Conclusions: Our research provides an agreed set of indicators for evaluating the quality of Graduate Entry Master of Nursing programs. This work will also make it possible to measure the immediate and longer-term impacts of Graduate Entry Master of Nursing programs for the nursing workforce. Future work must focus on testing feasibility and optimising utility while refining indicators across jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2019, ACC PROGR FAST TRACK
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, JAMA, V284, P3043
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Microsoft Excel
[4]  
[Anonymous], NAT STAT ETH COND HU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
[6]  
Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2017, GOV QUAL ACC BRANCH
[7]  
Australian Government Department of Education and Training Governance, QUAL ACC BRANCH 2020
[8]  
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, 2017, APR PROGR STUD REG N
[9]  
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, 2020, APPR PROGR STUD NURS
[10]  
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia,, 2020, FUNCT NURS MIDW BOAR