Can arguments boost warrant for Christian belief? Warrant boosting and the primacy of divine revelation

被引:1
作者
Diller, Kevin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Taylor Univ, BSCEP, Upland, IN 46989 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0034412510000065
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
It is well known that in Reformed circles there is significant doubt about the extent of the role natural theology might play in warranting Christian belief. I argue that even if we accept the core theological reservations and philosophical commitments shared by the likes of Karl Barth and Reformed epistemologists, there remains room for the arguments of natural theology to serve a vital, positive function. I offer a proposal for how we might think about the co-ordination of multiple sources of warrant for Christian belief such that arguments function as catalysts to or extensions of the deliverances of faith.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 200
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Kvanvig J.L., 1996, WARRANT CONT EPISTEM
[12]  
KVANVIG JL, 2001, WARRANTED CHRISTIAN, V3, P327
[13]  
KVANVIG JL, 2002, WARRANTED CHRISTIAN, V43, P81
[14]  
MASCORD K, 2006, A PLANTINGA CHRISTIA, P168
[15]  
Moore G. E., 1953, SOME MAIN PROBLEMS P, P108
[16]  
PLANTINGA, 1998, CALVIN THEOLOGICAL J, V33, P160
[17]  
PLANTINGA, 2002, PHILOS BOOKS, V43, P127
[18]   Rationality and public evidence: A reply to Richard Swinburne [J].
Plantinga, A .
RELIGIOUS STUDIES, 2001, 37 (02) :215-222
[19]  
PLANTINGA A, 1980, PHILOS KNOWLEDGE, P53
[20]  
PLANTINGA A, 1995, CHRISTIAN PHILOS CLO, P40