Identifying multiple active conformations in the G protein-coupled receptor activation landscape using computational methods

被引:3
作者
Dong, Sijia S. [1 ,3 ]
Goddard, William A., III [1 ]
Abrol, Ravinder [2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Mat & Proc Simulat Ctr, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Chem, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS, 2ND EDITION, PT A | 2017年 / 142卷
关键词
MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; ALLOSTERIC MODULATION; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/bs.mcb.2017.07.009
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins critical in cellular signaling, making them important targets for therapeutics. The activation of GPCRs is central to their function, requiring multiple conformations of the GPCRs in their activation landscape. To enable rational design of GPCR-targeting drugs, it is essential to obtain the ensemble of atomistic structures of GPCRs along their activation pathways. This is most challenging for structure determination experiments, making it valuable to develop reliable computational structure 'prediction methods. In particular, since the active-state conformations are higher in energy (less stable) than inactive-state conformations, they are difficult to stabilize. In addition, the computational methods are generally biased toward lowest energy structures by design and miss these high energy but functionally important conformations. To address this problem, we have developed a computationally efficient ActiveGEnSeMBLE method that systematically predicts multiple conformations that are likely in the GPCR activation landscape, including multiple active-and inactive-state conformations. ActiveGEnSeMBLE starts with a systematic coarse grid sampling of helix tilts/rotations (similar to 13 trillion transmembrane domain conformations) and identifies multiple potential active-state energy wells, using the TM3TM6 intracellular distance as a surrogate activation coordinate. These energy wells are then sampled locally using a finer grid in conformational space to find a locally minimized conformation in each energy well, which can be further relaxed using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This method, combining homology modeling, hierarchical complete conformational sampling, and nanosecond scale MD, provides one of the very few computational methods that predict multiple candidates for active-state conformations and is one of the most computationally affordable.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 186
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abrol Ravinder, 2012, Methods Mol Biol, V914, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-023-6_14
[2]  
Ballesteros J. A., 1995, Neuroscience Methods, P366, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1043-9471, DOI 10.1016/S1043-9471(05)80049-7]
[3]   Structure of the adenosine A2A receptor bound to an engineered G protein [J].
Carpenter, Byron ;
Nehme, Rony ;
Warne, Tony ;
Leslie, Andrew G. W. ;
Tate, Christopher G. .
NATURE, 2016, 536 (7614) :104-+
[4]   The Amber biomolecular simulation programs [J].
Case, DA ;
Cheatham, TE ;
Darden, T ;
Gohlke, H ;
Luo, R ;
Merz, KM ;
Onufriev, A ;
Simmerling, C ;
Wang, B ;
Woods, RJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 26 (16) :1668-1688
[5]   Crystal structure of metarhodopsin II [J].
Choe, Hui-Woog ;
Kim, Yong Ju ;
Park, Jung Hee ;
Morizumi, Takefumi ;
Pai, Emil F. ;
Krauss, Norbert ;
Hofmann, Klaus Peter ;
Scheerer, Patrick ;
Ernst, Oliver P. .
NATURE, 2011, 471 (7340) :651-U137
[6]   Conformational and Thermodynamic Landscape of GPCR Activation from Theory and Computation [J].
Dong, Sijia S. ;
Goddard, William A., III ;
Abrol, Ravinder .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (12) :2618-2629
[7]   HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases [J].
Floriano, WB ;
Vaidehi, N ;
Zamanakos, G ;
Goddard, WA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (01) :56-71
[8]   Methodological advances: the unsung heroes of the GPCR structural revolution [J].
Ghosh, Eshan ;
Kumari, Punita ;
Jaiman, Deepika ;
Shukla, Arun K. .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02) :69-81
[9]   Predicted 3D structures for adenosine receptors bound to ligands: Comparison to the crystal structure [J].
Goddard, William A., III ;
Kim, Soo-Kyung ;
Li, Youyong ;
Trzaskowski, Bartosz ;
Griffith, Adam R. ;
Abrol, Ravinder .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 170 (01) :10-20
[10]   G-protein-coupled receptors: past, present and future [J].
Hill, SJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 147 :S27-S37