The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback

被引:114
作者
Han, Ye [1 ]
Xu, Yueting [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Ctr Linguist & Appl Linguist, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Peer feedback; feedback literacy; teacher feedback; higher education; PROFICIENCY; EDUCATION; DIALOGUE;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although the concept of student feedback literacy has drawn increasing attention in higher education, empirical research on this matter is still in its infancy. In the area of peer feedback, little research has investigated the role of teacher follow-up feedback on peer feedback in the development of student feedback literacy. To address the research gap, a multiple-case study of three Chinese master's students enrolled in an academic writing course was conducted, drawing on the students' drafts with peer feedback, teacher written feedback on that peer feedback, semi-structured interviews, retrospective verbal reports, observation field notes and class documents. Three students' epistemological and practical knowledge about, attitudes towards, and self-efficacy beliefs in peer feedback were found to improve at different paces and to different degrees. However, considerable individual variations were observed with two high-achieving, highly motivated participants becoming more feedback-literate than their under-achieving, minimally motivated peer. Teacher feedback on peer feedback was found to have distinct impacts on individual students, depending on learner factors including language ability, beliefs and motivation. These findings suggest that teacher feedback on peer feedback, if consistently provided and compatible with learner factors, can scaffold both cognitive and social-affective aspects of student feedback literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 696
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback [J].
Allen, David ;
Katayama, Akiko .
SYSTEM, 2016, 56 :96-106
[2]  
Bloxham S., 2004, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V29, P721, DOI [10.1080/0260293042000227254, DOI 10.1080/0260293042000227254]
[3]   The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: disruptive effects of assessment patterns [J].
Boud, David ;
Lawson, Romy ;
Thompson, Darrall G. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 34 (01) :45-59
[4]   Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design [J].
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) :698-712
[5]   The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback [J].
Carless, David ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (08) :1315-1325
[6]   Developing sustainable feedback practices [J].
Carless, David ;
Salter, Diane ;
Yang, Min ;
Lam, Joy .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (04) :395-407
[7]  
Carson J.G., 1996, Jounal of Second Language Writing, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0
[8]   Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers' audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review [J].
Chang, Carrie Yea-huey .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2015, 25 :2-21
[9]   Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis [J].
Chen, Tsuiping .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2016, 29 (02) :365-397
[10]   Peer reviewers learn from giving comments [J].
Cho, Young Hoan ;
Cho, Kwangsu .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (05) :629-643