Do Speaker's emotions influence their language production? Studying the influence of disgust and amusement on alignment in interactive reference

被引:11
作者
Out, Charlotte [1 ]
Goudbeek, Martijn [1 ]
Krahmer, Emiel [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Commun & Cognit, Postbus 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Emotion; Spoken language production; Conceptual alignment; Dialogue; Attribute selection; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; VOCAL EXPRESSION; NEGATIVE AFFECTS; MOOD; SPEECH; BROADEN; OVERSPECIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; CONVERSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101255
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The influence of emotion on the early stages of spoken language production such as content selection has received little scholarly attention. During content selection in dialogue, speakers often take the utterances of their dialogue partners into account. For example, while speakers generally prefer to use color in their descriptions, they start to use dispreferred attributes such as orientation and size more when they are primed by a prerecorded partner using these dispreferred attributes (Goudbeek and Krahmer, 2012). The current study assessed the role of amusement and disgust in this process of conceptual alignment, while simultaneously replicating this earlier finding in a more realistic setting. Three types of alignment were analyzed: alignment of dispreferred properties (with or without additional properties), alignment of overspecified descriptions (both used by G&K), and alignment of dispreferred properties only. The results generalize the findings by Goudbeek and Krahmer (2012) to a more naturalistic dialogue setting: partners indeed align with each other's attributes in the choice of their referring expressions. The effects of emotion were generally limited, but disgusted speakers do tend to align more to the dispreferred attributes (e.g., size) used by their conversation partner than amused speakers. Our findings highlight the robustness of alignment in referring expressions produced in interactive settings, and suggest that emotional state can have an impact on this process. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [41] Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing
    Gasper, K
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2004, 18 (03) : 405 - 421
  • [42] Reference Production as Search: The Impact of Domain Size on the Production of Distinguishing Descriptions
    Gatt, Albert
    Krahmer, Emiel
    van Deemter, Kees
    van Gompel, Roger P. G.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2017, 41 : 1457 - 1492
  • [43] Web-based mood induction
    Goeritz, Anja S.
    Moser, Klaus
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2006, 20 (06) : 887 - 896
  • [44] Goldrick M., 2014, The Oxford Handbook of Language Production
  • [45] Alignment in Interactive Reference Production: Content Planning, Modifier Ordering, and Referential Overspecification
    Goudbeek, Martijn
    Krahmer, Emiel
    [J]. TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 4 (02) : 269 - 289
  • [46] Beyond arousal: Valence and potency/control cues in the vocal expression of emotion
    Goudbeek, Martijn
    Scherer, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (03) : 1322 - 1336
  • [47] EMOTION ELICITATION USING FILMS
    GROSS, JJ
    LEVENSON, RW
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 1995, 9 (01) : 87 - 108
  • [48] Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions
    Harle, Katia M.
    Sanfey, Alan G.
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2010, 24 (08) : 1456 - 1465
  • [49] Hatfield E, 1994, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V2, P96, DOI [10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10770953]
  • [50] When do speakers take into account common ground?
    Horton, WS
    Keysar, B
    [J]. COGNITION, 1996, 59 (01) : 91 - 117