THE ROLE OF RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA: REPORTING THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE OF 43 PATIENTS

被引:86
作者
Veness, Michael [1 ]
Foote, Matthew [2 ]
Gebski, Val [3 ]
Poulsen, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Westmead Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandria Hosp, Div Canc Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2010年 / 78卷 / 03期
关键词
Merkel cell carcinoma; Neuroendocrine; Radiotherapy; Small-cell carcinoma; RADIATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review the role of radiotherapy (RTx) alone in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Methods and Materials: The records of 43 patients with MCC treated with RTx alone between 1993 and 2007 at the Westmead and Royal Brisbane/Mater Hospitals, Australia, were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was performed by use of Cox regression analysis. Results: The median age was 79 years (range, 48-91 years) in 19 women (44%) and 24 men (56%). All patients were white, and 5 (12%) had immunosuppression. A majority (56%) underwent irradiation at initial diagnosis, with the remainder (44%) treated in the relapse setting. The median duration of follow-up was 39 months. The head and neck comprised the most frequently treated site (47%). The median maximum lesion size was 30 mm (range, 5-130 mm). Relapse developed in 60% of patients, with most being out-of-field relapses. The in-field control rate was 75%. Most out-of-field relapses were to visceral organs. Relapse developed outside the irradiated field in 53% of patients. On multivariate analysis, only nodal status (negative nodes vs. nodes present) was significantly associated with relapse-free survival, with p = 0.005 (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.663). Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 58% and 37%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with MCC treated with RTx have a high likelihood of obtaining in-field control. Doses of 50 to 55 Gy in 20 to 25 fractions are recommended. A minority of patients are cured, with many dying of systemic relapse. Lower dose fractionation schedules (e.g., 25 Gy in 5 fractions) may be considered in patients with a very poor performance status. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 709
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Merkel cell carcinoma: Prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution [J].
Allen, PJ ;
Bowne, WB ;
Jaques, DP ;
Brennan, MF ;
Busam, K ;
Coit, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (10) :2300-2309
[2]   TABLES OF EQUIVALENT DOSE IN 2 GY FRACTIONS - A SIMPLE APPLICATION OF THE LINEAR-QUADRATIC FORMULA [J].
BARTON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (02) :371-378
[3]  
CONCANNON R, 2009, J AM ACAD D IN PRESS
[4]  
FOOTE M, 2009, INT J RAD O IN PRESS
[5]   Merkel cell carcinoma adjuvant therapy: Current data support radiation but not chemotherapy [J].
Garneski, Kelly M. ;
Nghiem, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 57 (01) :166-169
[6]   Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients:: the AEIOU features [J].
Heath, Michelle ;
Jaimes, Natalia ;
Lemos, Bianca ;
Mostaghimi, Arash ;
Wang, Linda C. ;
Penas, Pablo E. ;
Nghiem, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 58 (03) :375-381
[7]   Regarding adjuvant radiation therapy in Merkel cell carcinoma: Selection bias and its affect on overall survival [J].
Housman, Douglas M. ;
Decker, Roy H. ;
Wilson, Lynn D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (28) :4503-4504
[8]  
KOH CS, 2009, AUST J DERM IN PRESS
[9]   RADIATION SENSITIVITY OF MERKEL CELL-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES [J].
LEONARD, JH ;
RAMSAY, JR ;
KEARSLEY, JH ;
BIRRELL, GW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (05) :1401-1407
[10]   Adjuvant local irradiation for Merkel cell carcinoma [J].
Lewis, Kevan G. ;
Weinstock, Martin A. ;
Weaver, Amy L. ;
Otley, Clark C. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (06) :693-700