Effects of white-tailed deer on the native earthworm, Eisenoides carolinensis, in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA

被引:12
|
作者
Rearick, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Kintz, Laura [2 ]
Burke, Katherine L. [2 ,3 ]
Ransom, Tami S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Clarion Univ Pennsylvania, Clarion, PA 16214 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Mt Lake Biol Stn, Pembroke, VA 24136 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Biol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Eisenoides carolinensis; Fecal pellet use; Lumbricus terrestris; Odocoileus virginianus; Southern Appalachian mountains; ODOCOILEUS-VIRGINIANUS; EXOTIC EARTHWORMS; HABITAT QUALITY; FOREST SOILS; OCTET-METHOD; POPULATIONS; INVASION; COMMUNITIES; TEMPERATURE; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.09.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Research on earthworms in North America has focused on the effects of invasive earthworms, with few studies examining the ecology of native earthworm species. Deer have been shown to influence belowground processes through grazing, trampling, and fecal pellet deposition. We proposed that native earthworms in an oak-dominated forest in Virginia might benefit from increased organic matter provided by deer fecal material. We examined potential interactions between a common aboveground herbivore, the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and earthworms using laboratory and field experiments. In our laboratory experiment, we found that a native earthworm, Eisenoides carolinensis, and an invasive earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris both fared better in treatments with deer pellets compared with the treatment with leaf litter alone. In our field experiment, we used fences to exclude deer from six plots and left twelve plots unfenced to explore the effects of deer activity on earthworm biomass and density. We also examined the effects of deer on soil and vegetation characteristics. After three years, the amount of herbaceous cover was higher on fenced plots compared with unfenced plots. Although we found no other differences for vegetation and soil characteristics between fenced and unfenced plots, many of these variables were important as covariates in our models examining the effect of deer exclusion on earthworms, indicating plot-level (as opposed to treatment-level) variation in these variables. All identifiable earthworms were either E. carolinensis or Diplocardia spp. (both native species), with E. carolinensis making up 90% of the specimens. The total biomass of earthworms, as well as the biomass and density of adult and small juvenile earthworms, was greater on unfenced plots with deer activity compared with fenced plots. This study highlights the importance of above- and below-ground interactions in forest ecosystems by showing that E. carolinensis appears to benefit from the presence of deer and adds to our sparse knowledge of the ecology of this native earthworm. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S173 / S180
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immunocontraception of white-tailed deer using native and recombinant zona pellucida vaccines
    Miller, LA
    Johns, BE
    Killian, GJ
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2000, 63 (3-4) : 187 - 195
  • [32] Effects of abundant white-tailed deer on vegetation, animals, mycorrhizal fungi, and soils
    Shelton, Angela L.
    Henning, Jeremiah A.
    Schultz, Peggy
    Clay, Keith
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 320 : 39 - 49
  • [33] Effects of selective harvest on antler size in white-tailed deer: A modeling approach
    Webb, Stephen L.
    Demarais, Stephen
    Strickland, Bronson K.
    Deyoung, Randy W.
    Kinghorn, Brian P.
    Gee, Kenneth L.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (01) : 48 - 56
  • [34] Effects of Bait on Male White-Tailed Deer Resource Selection
    Johnson, James T.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Conner, L. Mike
    Cherry, Michael J.
    Killmaster, Charlie H.
    Johannsen, Kristina L.
    Miller, Karl, V
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [35] Fine-scale genetic and social structuring in a central Appalachian white-tailed deer herd
    Miller, Brad F.
    DeYoung, Randy W.
    Campbell, Tyler A.
    Laseter, Benjamin R.
    Ford, W. Mark
    Miller, Karl V.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2010, 91 (03) : 681 - 689
  • [36] Do white-tailed deer and the exotic plant garlic mustard interact to affect the growth and persistence of native forest plants?
    Waller, Donald M.
    Maas, Lisa I.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 304 : 296 - 302
  • [37] Estimation and Implications of Space Use for White-Tailed Deer Management in Southern Michigan
    Hiller, Tim L.
    Campa, Henry, III
    Winterstein, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 73 (02) : 201 - 209
  • [38] PREVALENCE OF LEPTOSPIRA ANTIBODIES IN WHITE-TAILED DEER, CADES COVE, GREAT-SMOKY-MOUNTAINS-NATIONAL-PARK, TENNESSEE, USA
    NEW, JC
    WATHEN, WG
    DLUTKOWSKI, S
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1993, 29 (04) : 561 - 567
  • [39] Evaluating the effects of ecosystem management alternatives on elk, mule deer, and white-tailed deer in the interior Columbia River basin, USA
    Lehmkuhl, JF
    Kie, JG
    Bender, LC
    Servheen, G
    Nyberg, H
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 153 (1-3) : 89 - 104
  • [40] EPIZOOTIOLOGY OF CRANIAL ABSCESS DISEASE IN WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) OF GEORGIA, USA
    Cohen, Bradley S.
    Belser, Emily H.
    Killmaster, Charlie H.
    Bowers, John W.
    Irwin, Brian J.
    Yabsley, Michael J.
    Miller, Karl V.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2015, 51 (03) : 609 - 618