Effects of white-tailed deer on the native earthworm, Eisenoides carolinensis, in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA

被引:12
|
作者
Rearick, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Kintz, Laura [2 ]
Burke, Katherine L. [2 ,3 ]
Ransom, Tami S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Clarion Univ Pennsylvania, Clarion, PA 16214 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Mt Lake Biol Stn, Pembroke, VA 24136 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Biol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Eisenoides carolinensis; Fecal pellet use; Lumbricus terrestris; Odocoileus virginianus; Southern Appalachian mountains; ODOCOILEUS-VIRGINIANUS; EXOTIC EARTHWORMS; HABITAT QUALITY; FOREST SOILS; OCTET-METHOD; POPULATIONS; INVASION; COMMUNITIES; TEMPERATURE; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.09.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Research on earthworms in North America has focused on the effects of invasive earthworms, with few studies examining the ecology of native earthworm species. Deer have been shown to influence belowground processes through grazing, trampling, and fecal pellet deposition. We proposed that native earthworms in an oak-dominated forest in Virginia might benefit from increased organic matter provided by deer fecal material. We examined potential interactions between a common aboveground herbivore, the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and earthworms using laboratory and field experiments. In our laboratory experiment, we found that a native earthworm, Eisenoides carolinensis, and an invasive earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris both fared better in treatments with deer pellets compared with the treatment with leaf litter alone. In our field experiment, we used fences to exclude deer from six plots and left twelve plots unfenced to explore the effects of deer activity on earthworm biomass and density. We also examined the effects of deer on soil and vegetation characteristics. After three years, the amount of herbaceous cover was higher on fenced plots compared with unfenced plots. Although we found no other differences for vegetation and soil characteristics between fenced and unfenced plots, many of these variables were important as covariates in our models examining the effect of deer exclusion on earthworms, indicating plot-level (as opposed to treatment-level) variation in these variables. All identifiable earthworms were either E. carolinensis or Diplocardia spp. (both native species), with E. carolinensis making up 90% of the specimens. The total biomass of earthworms, as well as the biomass and density of adult and small juvenile earthworms, was greater on unfenced plots with deer activity compared with fenced plots. This study highlights the importance of above- and below-ground interactions in forest ecosystems by showing that E. carolinensis appears to benefit from the presence of deer and adds to our sparse knowledge of the ecology of this native earthworm. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S173 / S180
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting intensity of white-tailed deer herbivory in the Central Appalachian Mountains
    Kniowski, Andrew B.
    Ford, W. Mark
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (03) : 841 - 850
  • [2] The attractiveness of a liquid bait to white-tailed deer in the central Appalachian Mountains, Virginia, USA
    Hakim, S
    McShea, WJ
    Mason, JR
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1996, 32 (02) : 395 - 398
  • [3] Spatial factors of white-tailed deer herbivory assessment in the central Appalachian Mountains
    Kniowski, Andrew B.
    Ford, W. Mark
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2018, 190 (04)
  • [4] Predicting intensity of white-tailed deer herbivory in the Central Appalachian Mountains
    Andrew B.Kniowski
    W.Mark Ford
    JournalofForestryResearch, 2018, 29 (03) : 841 - 850
  • [5] Invasive earthworm and soil litter response to the experimental removal of white-tailed deer and an invasive shrub
    Mahon, Michael B.
    Crist, Thomas O.
    ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (05)
  • [6] Population characteristics of a central Appalachian white-tailed deer herd
    Campbell, TA
    Laseter, BR
    Ford, WM
    Miller, KV
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2005, 33 (01): : 212 - 221
  • [7] Effects of Supplemental Feeding and Density of White-Tailed Deer on Rodents
    Moseley, William A.
    Cooper, Susan M.
    Hewitt, David G.
    Fulbright, Timothy E.
    Deyoung, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (03) : 675 - 681
  • [8] Population Dynamics of a Declining White-Tailed Deer Population in the Southern Appalachian Region of the United States
    Edge, Adam C.
    Rosenberger, Jacalyn P.
    Killmaster, Charlie H.
    Johannsen, Kristina L.
    Osborn, David A.
    Miller, Karl V.
    D'Angelo, Gino J.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (23):
  • [9] Survival of white-tailed deer fawns in southern Illinois
    Rohm, John H.
    Nielsen, Clayton K.
    Woolf, Alan
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (03) : 851 - 860
  • [10] SELENIUM STATUS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA
    MCDOWELL, LR
    FORRESTER, DJ
    LINDA, SB
    WRIGHT, SD
    WILKINSON, NS
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1995, 31 (02) : 205 - 211