Bibliometric analysis of bioeconomy research in South Africa

被引:17
|
作者
Bambo, Thabang Lazarus [1 ]
Pouris, Anastassios [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Inst Technol Innovat, Grad Sch Technol Management, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Bioeconomy; Biotechnology; Bibliometric; South Africa; DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY AREAS; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; WEB; JOURNALS; RANKINGS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-020-03626-y
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This document provides an analysis of bioeconomy research in South Africa and it discusses sources of growth in the country's bioeconomy literature in general. We performed bibliometric analysis as indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) for number of South African authored publications and citations in bioeconomy, and compared them with Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICS) and selected countries for the period 2008 to 2018. The WoS is used for research dealing with the scientific dynamic of a particular topic in most widely diffused journals and for citation analysis. The results highlight South Africa ranked last in the BRICS group in terms of number of bioeconomy publications produced in the selected period, and has a world share of 0.8%, which is higher than the national research average of 0.5%. The citations growth for South Africa bioeconomy publication increased by 6.8%, higher than Brazil, Russia and world citations during the period under review. The University of Cape Town is a leader in bioeconomy publications in South Africa followed by University of Stellenbosch and the University of KwaZulu Natal, with majority of the publications on environmental sciences ecology. South Africa collaborates the most with institutions from the United States of America in bioeconomy research, and the percent of international collaboration is similar with that of national scientific publications. However, South Africa experienced a decline in bioeconomy industry collaboration publications during this period.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 51
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bibliometric analysis of bioeconomy research in South Africa
    Thabang Lazarus Bambo
    Anastassios Pouris
    Scientometrics, 2020, 125 : 29 - 51
  • [2] Analysis of patents and citations for selected areas of the bioeconomy in South Africa
    Bambo, Thabang Lazarus
    Pouris, Anastassios
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 16 (01) : 79 - 98
  • [3] Bibliometric analysis of the development of nanoscience research in South Africa
    Makhoba, Xolani
    Pouris, Anastassios
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2017, 113 (11-12) : 36 - 44
  • [4] Health research publications by South African authors from 1996 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis
    Mouako, Arlette Leufak
    Zunza, Moleen
    Ndwandwe, Duduzile
    Uthman, Olalekan Abdulrahman
    Wiysonge, Charles Shey
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 42
  • [5] Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan
    Bajwa, R. S.
    Yaldram, K.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (02) : 529 - 540
  • [6] Research on cyberbullying and suicide: a bibliometric analysis
    Denche-Zamorano, A.
    Mendoza-Munoz, M.
    Barrios-Fernandez, S.
    Galan-Arroyo, C.
    Adsuar, J. C.
    Rojo-Ramos, J. y
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2025, 62 (01) : 336 - 353
  • [7] The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis
    Papadopoulou, Christina-Ioanna
    Loizou, Efstratios
    Melfou, Katerina
    Chatzitheodoridis, Fotios
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)
  • [8] Knowledge Mapping of bioeconomy: A bibliometric analysis
    Wei, Xun
    Liu, Qianqian
    Pu, Aqing
    Wang, Shutong
    Chen, Feifei
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhang, Yong
    Dong, Zhenying
    Wan, Xiangyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [9] Bibliometric analysis of climate research in East Africa: The rise and progress
    Rady, Mohammed
    Alasow, Ahmed Abdiaziz
    Hersi, Abdifatah Ahmed
    SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 11 (01):
  • [10] Interpreting research in South Africa: A bibliometric study
    Kotze, Herculene
    STELLENBOSCH PAPERS IN LINGUISTICS PLUS-SPIL PLUS, 2020, 59 : 45 - 60