Application of corrective formula for intraocular pressure changes in patients that underwent LASIK

被引:3
作者
Cabral Silva, Thiago George [1 ]
Fernandes Polido, Julia Gomes [1 ]
Pinheiro, Mauricio Vieira [1 ]
de Freitas Silva, Andre Luis [1 ]
Goldbach, Laerte [1 ]
Degaspare Monte Mascaro, Vera Lucia [1 ]
Serracarbassa, Pedro Duraes [1 ]
Xavier dos Santos Araujo, Maria Emilia [1 ]
机构
[1] HSPE SP, Dept Oftalmol, IAMSPE, BR-04029000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Intraocular pressure/physiology; Keratomileusis; laser in situ; Lasers; excimer; Photorefractive keratectomy; Tonometry; ocular; Corneal topography; Refractive surgical procedures; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1590/S0004-27492011000200006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) pre and post LASIK, correlating it to changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) and average simulated keratometry (K), as well as verifying the results of a corrective formula previously proposed. Methods: Longitudinal prospective study conducted in outpatients that underwent to LASIK. Patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination, previously and 2 months after the surgery. Intraocular pressure was evaluated with Goldmann applanation tonometer between 9 am and 11 am, average simulated keratometry was evaluated using corneal topography and central corneal thickness was measured with ultrasound pachymetry, been considered the average of three measurements. Two patients were excluded due to surgery or eye disease, and previous use of topical steroids over the past three months. The surgeries were performed according to standard procedures. The formula [ real IOP = IOP measured + (540 - ECC)/71 + (43 - K)/2.7 + 0.75 mmHg] proposed for correcting intraocular pressure was used. Results: Fifteen eyes of eight patients were evaluated, age ranged from 24 to 46 years (mean: 31.37 +/- 7.27). There was a statistically significant difference between the measurements of intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and average simulated keratometry pre and post-LASIK. (p=0.0001). It was observed that each 1D corrected underestimated the IOP 1.06 +/- 0.59 mmHg (0.11 a 1.89 mmHg). The use of the corrective formula lead to 80% of eyes within 2.50 mmHg of preoperative intraocular pressure. Although, the two sets of data are statistically different (p=0.0266). Conclusions: Post LASIK eyes presented lower intraocular pressure than preoperatively. Intraocular pressure was moderately correlated to central corneal thickness and weakly correlated to average simulated keratometry. With the use of the corrective formula, we were able to determine that 80% were within 2.50 mmHg of the preoperative intraocular pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 105
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Brandt James D, 2004, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V15, P85, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200404000-00004
[2]  
EHLERS N, 1974, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V52, P740
[3]   Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Emara, B ;
Probst, LE ;
Tingey, DP ;
Kennedy, DW ;
Willms, LJ ;
Machat, J .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (10) :1320-1325
[4]   A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice [J].
Grodum, K ;
Heijl, A ;
Bengtsson, B .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 80 (06) :627-631
[5]  
HANSEN FK, 1971, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V49, P82
[6]   A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism [J].
Kohlhaas, M ;
Spoerl, E ;
Boehm, AG ;
Pollack, K .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 22 (03) :263-267
[7]   Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery [J].
Montés-Micó, R ;
Charman, WN .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2001, 21 (03) :228-235
[8]  
PALLIKARIS IG, 1994, J REFRACT CORNEAL S, V10, P498
[9]  
Ruangvaravate Ngamkae, 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V88, P340
[10]   THE EFFECT OF CORNEAL THICKNESS ON APPLANATION TONOMETRY [J].
WHITACRE, MM ;
STEIN, RA ;
HASSANEIN, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 115 (05) :592-596