The impact of nurses' perceptions of systems thinking on occurrence and reporting of adverse events: A cross-sectional study

被引:11
|
作者
Kakemam, Edris [1 ]
Albelbeisi, Ahmed Hassan [2 ]
Davoodabadi, Samane [2 ]
Azarmi, Mina [3 ]
Zolghadr, Fatemeh [4 ]
Mamene, Mehdi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Tabriz Hlth Serv Management Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Int Campus TUMS IC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Ilam Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Ilam, Iran
关键词
adverse events; medical error; patient safety; quality of care; systems thinking; SAFETY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.13524
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aims To assess systems thinking level and its relationship with occurrence and reporting of adverse events in Iranian nurses. Background Systems thinking has recently emerged as an important element of patient safety and quality improvement in health care systems. It helps health care professionals to understand the different elements of health care systems, the interrelatedness and interdependencies of these elements in the health care systems. Methods This cross-sectional survey was carried out in 10 teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A total of 511 nurses were selected using simple random sampling. Systems thinking was measured using the validated Systems Thinking Scale. Data analysis was performed by descriptive analyses, independent t test and logistic regression analysis. Results The average score for total systems thinking was a mean of 49.45 (SD = 12.10; range 0-80). In total, 67.5% of participants reported the experience of the occurrence of adverse events leading to harm to patients, and 65.2% of them responded as having appropriate adverse events reporting behaviours. Nurses who had higher scores in systems thinking were found to be more likely to report adverse events (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.05-1.09), whereas they were less prone to experience adverse events (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Conclusion Our results indicated that the nurses' systems thinking level was moderate. Systems thinking had a significant role in preventing the occurrence of adverse events as well as improving the reporting of adverse events. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance the competency of nurses' systems thinking to prevent the occurrence of adverse events and to improve the reporting of adverse events. Implications for nursing management Nursing managers need to focus on the systems thinking weaknesses and the occurrence and the reporting of adverse events in policymaking, practice and research. Also, systems thinking should be integrated with the health care system for preventing the occurrence of adverse events and improving reporting of adverse events. They should support, lead and allocate the essential pragmatic strategies and resources for the involvement of all health care members in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among the General Public in Lithuania: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Valinciute, Agne
    Gerbutaviciene, Rima Jurate
    Paukstaitiene, Renata
    Kubiliene, Loreta
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [42] Supporting health professionals after an adverse event in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional study
    Franziska, Reiser Crelier
    David, Schwappach
    Rene, Schwendimann
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2020, 150
  • [43] Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture among Triage Nurses in the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Fekonja, Zvonka
    Kmetec, Sergej
    Reljic, Natasa Mlinar
    Kolaric, Jozica Cerne
    Pajnkihar, Majda
    Strnad, Matej
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (24)
  • [44] Structural empowerment and nurses' patient identification behaviors: a cross-sectional study
    Kim, Young Mee
    Kim, Se Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (05) : 832 - 843
  • [45] Nurses' knowledge of radiation protection: A cross-sectional study
    Hirvonen, L.
    Schroderus-Salo, T.
    Henner, A.
    Ahonen, S.
    Kaariainen, M.
    Miettunen, J.
    Mikkonen, K.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2019, 25 (04) : E108 - E112
  • [46] ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS
    Seynaeve, Simon
    Verbrugghe, Walter
    Claes, Brigitte
    Vandenplas, Dirk
    Reyntiens, Dirk
    Jorens, Philippe G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 20 (06) : E131 - E140
  • [47] PEGylated versus non-PEGylated drugs: A cross-sectional analysis of adverse events in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database
    Zhu, Zhengyi
    Gao, Peng
    Hu, Yan
    Wang, Junyan
    Wang, Huijuan
    Yang, Jufei
    Huang, Lingfei
    Ji, Cai
    Ni, Yinghua
    Fang, Luo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 58 (06) : 332 - 342
  • [48] Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study
    Hughes, Shannon
    Cohen, David
    Jaggi, Rachel
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (07):
  • [49] Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    de Wet, Carl
    Johnson, Paul
    Mash, Robert
    McConnachie, Alex
    Bowie, Paul
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [50] Nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture and barriers to reporting medication errors: A cross-sectional study
    Alrasheeday, Awatif M.
    Alkubati, Sameer A.
    Alqalah, Talal Ali Hussein
    Alrubaiee, Gamil Ghaleb
    Alshammari, Bushra
    Almazan, Joseph U.
    Abdullah, Saleh O.
    Loutfy, Ahmed
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2025, 146