The impact of nurses' perceptions of systems thinking on occurrence and reporting of adverse events: A cross-sectional study

被引:11
|
作者
Kakemam, Edris [1 ]
Albelbeisi, Ahmed Hassan [2 ]
Davoodabadi, Samane [2 ]
Azarmi, Mina [3 ]
Zolghadr, Fatemeh [4 ]
Mamene, Mehdi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Tabriz Hlth Serv Management Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Int Campus TUMS IC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Ilam Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Ilam, Iran
关键词
adverse events; medical error; patient safety; quality of care; systems thinking; SAFETY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.13524
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aims To assess systems thinking level and its relationship with occurrence and reporting of adverse events in Iranian nurses. Background Systems thinking has recently emerged as an important element of patient safety and quality improvement in health care systems. It helps health care professionals to understand the different elements of health care systems, the interrelatedness and interdependencies of these elements in the health care systems. Methods This cross-sectional survey was carried out in 10 teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A total of 511 nurses were selected using simple random sampling. Systems thinking was measured using the validated Systems Thinking Scale. Data analysis was performed by descriptive analyses, independent t test and logistic regression analysis. Results The average score for total systems thinking was a mean of 49.45 (SD = 12.10; range 0-80). In total, 67.5% of participants reported the experience of the occurrence of adverse events leading to harm to patients, and 65.2% of them responded as having appropriate adverse events reporting behaviours. Nurses who had higher scores in systems thinking were found to be more likely to report adverse events (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.05-1.09), whereas they were less prone to experience adverse events (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Conclusion Our results indicated that the nurses' systems thinking level was moderate. Systems thinking had a significant role in preventing the occurrence of adverse events as well as improving the reporting of adverse events. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance the competency of nurses' systems thinking to prevent the occurrence of adverse events and to improve the reporting of adverse events. Implications for nursing management Nursing managers need to focus on the systems thinking weaknesses and the occurrence and the reporting of adverse events in policymaking, practice and research. Also, systems thinking should be integrated with the health care system for preventing the occurrence of adverse events and improving reporting of adverse events. They should support, lead and allocate the essential pragmatic strategies and resources for the involvement of all health care members in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses' systems thinking competency, medical error reporting, and the occurrence of adverse events: a cross-sectional study
    Hwang, Jee-In
    Park, Hyeoun-Ae
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2017, 53 (06) : 622 - 632
  • [2] Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study
    Alanazi, Faisal Khalaf
    Molloy, Luke
    Lapkin, Samuel
    Sim, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2024, 29 (08) : 681 - 695
  • [3] Nurses' perceptions of systems thinking and safe nursing care: A cross-sectional study
    Moazez, Maryam
    Miri, Sakineh
    Foroughameri, Golnaz
    Farokhzadian, Jamileh
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (04) : 822 - 830
  • [4] Nurses? Intentions, Awareness and Barriers in Reporting Adverse Events: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Tertiary Hospitals in China
    Zhao, Xiaoying
    Shi, Chunhong
    Zhao, Lihua
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 : 1987 - 1997
  • [5] Assessing safety culture and second victim experience following adverse events among Romanian nurses: a cross-sectional study
    Istrate, Mirabela Ioana
    Forray, Alina Ioana
    Ungureanu, Marius-Ionut
    Mira, Jose Joaquin
    Constantinescu, Sorana Alexandra
    Chereches, Razvan Mircea
    BMC NURSING, 2025, 24 (01):
  • [6] Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support
    Yaow, Clyve Yu Leon
    Ng, Qin Xiang
    Chong, Ryan Ian Houe
    Ong, Clarence
    Chong, Nicolette Zy-Yin
    Yap, Nicole Li Xian
    Hong, Ashley Shuen Ying
    Tan, Benita Kiat Tee
    Loh, Amos Hong Pheng
    Wong, Andrew Siang Yih
    Tan, Hiang Khoon
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Clinical nurses' patient safety competency, systems thinking and missed nursing care: A cross-sectional survey
    Chang, Hyoung Eun
    Manojlovich, Milisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (02)
  • [8] Inappropriate hospital admission as a risk factor for the subsequent development of adverse events: a cross-sectional study
    San Jose-Saras, Diego
    Vicente-Guijarro, Jorge
    Sousa, Paulo
    Moreno-Nunez, Paloma
    Aranaz-Andres, Jesus Maria
    BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [9] Investigating the impact of temporary nurses on permanent nurses' commitment via perceptions of illegitimate tasks: A cross-sectional study
    Gahrmann, Caroline
    Klumb, Petra Liselotte
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (07) : 2835 - 2846
  • [10] Adverse events in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study
    de Assis, Stefanny Furtado
    Villas Boas Vieira, Debora Feijo
    Escobar Gimenes de Sousa, Fernanda Raphael
    de Oliveira Pinheiro, Carlos Eduardo
    do Prado, Patricia Rezende
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2022, 56 : e20210481