Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing Acceptability: Comparison of Two Self-Sampling Modalities

被引:46
作者
Igidbashian, Sarah [1 ]
Boveri, Sara [1 ]
Spolti, Noemi [1 ]
Radice, Davide [2 ]
Sandri, Maria Teresa [3 ]
Sideri, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Prevent Gynaecol Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Lab Med Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
INVASIVE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; CANCER; WOMEN; DNA; SPECIMENS; MORTALITY; HISTORY; METAANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; CONCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2010.2189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be used as a primary test for cervical cancer screening. HPV self-sampling has the potential to replace physician/nurse sampling. Our objective was to compare the acceptability of two self-sampling methods among 205 women undergoing an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO). Methods: One hundred eleven patients were given a Hybrid Capture (HC) Cervical Sampler (TM) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 94 received a self-lavaging device, the Delphi (R) Screener (Delphi Bioscience, Scherpenzeel, The Netherlands), both with written instructions. Self-sampling was performed just before the clinician-collected cervical sample. Women responded to questions using 5-point ordinal scales on the general acceptability of self-sampling and the physical comfort, embarrassment, pain, and difficulty experienced. Participants were also asked whether they prefer self-sampling or clinician sampling. Results: Both self-sampling methods were generally accepted with a significantly high score (p = 0.005) and significantly lower embarrassment (p = 0.042) in favor of the Delphi Screener. Both self-sampling methods were physically well accepted, not painful, and easy to perform. Most women (n = 117, 68%) preferred the self-sampled compared to the clinician-sampled test, with a significantly higher proportion in the Delphi Screener group (n = 59, 77.6%) compared to those using the HC Sampler (n = 58, 60.4%) (p = 0.021). Conclusions: The present study shows that self-sampling for HPV testing is favorably received by women. A sampling device specifically developed for self-sampling, such as the Delphi Screener, shows the highest degree of satisfaction. A well-accepted HPV sampling method could be especially useful for women who do not take part in cervical screening or in settings where organized screening is not fully implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Acceptability of self-collection of specimens for HPV DNA testing in an urban population
    Anhang, R
    Nelson, JA
    Telerant, R
    Chiasson, MA
    Wright, TC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2005, 14 (08) : 721 - 728
  • [2] Clinical applications of HPV testing: A summary of meta-analyses
    Arbyn, Marc
    Sasieni, Peter
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Clavel, Christine
    Koliopoulos, George
    Dillner, Joakim
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 : 78 - 89
  • [3] Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands
    Bos, Anita B.
    Rebolj, Matejka
    Habbema, J. Dik F.
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (10) : 2372 - 2375
  • [4] Box G. E., 1978, Statistics for experimenters, V664
  • [5] High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush
    Brink, Antoinette A. T. P.
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Wiegerinck, Maarten A. H. M.
    Nieboer, Thedoor E.
    Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
    van Kemenade, Folkert
    Daalmeijer, Nathalie Fransen
    Hesselink, Albertus T.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (07) : 2518 - 2523
  • [6] THE CYTOLOGIC HISTORY OF 245 PATIENTS DEVELOPING INVASIVE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA
    CARMICHAEL, JA
    JEFFREY, JF
    STEELE, HD
    OHLKE, ID
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 148 (05) : 685 - 690
  • [7] Primary cervical cancer screening by self-sampling of human papillomavirus DNA in internal medicine outpatient clinics
    Dannecker, C
    Siebert, U
    Thaler, CJ
    Kiermeir, D
    Hepp, H
    Hillemanns, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (06) : 863 - 869
  • [8] DEVESA SS, 1987, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V79, P701
  • [9] The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening
    Dzuba, IG
    Díaz, EY
    Allen, B
    Leonard, YF
    Ponce, ECL
    Shah, KV
    Bishai, D
    Lorincz, A
    Ferris, D
    Turnbull, B
    Avila, MH
    Salmerón, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (03): : 265 - 274
  • [10] INEXPENSIVE POPULATION SCREENING FOR ABNORMAL-CELLS FROM THE UTERINE CERVIX AND VALID RESULTS USING THE VAGINAL CYTOPIPETTE
    FISCHER, S
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 46 (01) : 62 - 64