Impact of smoking in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:8
作者
Agarwal, Manyoo [1 ]
Agrawal, Sahil [2 ]
Garg, Lohit [3 ]
Reed, Guy L. [4 ]
Khouzam, Rami N. [4 ]
Ibebuogu, Uzoma N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] St Lukes Univ Hlth Network, Div Cardiovasc Med, Dept Internal Med, Bethlehem, PA USA
[3] Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Div Cardiovasc Med, Dept Internal Med, Allentown, PA USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Internal Med, 956 Court Ave,Suite D 334, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
Smoker's paradox; transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); aortic stenosis; National Inpatient Sample database;
D O I
10.21037/atm.2017.11.32
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The paradox that smokers have better clinical outcomes in cardiovascular diseases remains controversial. No literature exists studying impact of smoking on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: We performed an electronic search of the 2011-2012 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify all TAVR hospitalizations. Outcomes were measured comparing smokers to non-smokers. Results: A total of 8,345 TAVR hospitalizations were identified with 24% being smokers. Compared to non-smokers, smokers were younger (80.4 +/- 8.8 vs. 81.4 +/- 9.2 years, P<0.001), were more often men (63.6% vs. 47.8%, P<0.001), and had a higher disease burden. Despite a higher disease burden, smokers had lower post procedure stroke (2.8% vs. 3.1%), hemorrhage events (28.2% vs. 32.0%, P<0.05) and lower all cause in hospital mortality (1.2% vs. 5.7%, adjusted odds ratio 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.32, P<0.001) compared to nonsmokers. Conclusions: Despite having a higher cardiovascular disease burden, smokers had better outcomes compared to non-smokers. Therefore the smoker's paradox is applicable in the TAVR cohort.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Lack of Correlation between Smoking Status and Early Postoperative Outcome following Valve Surgery [J].
Al-Sarraf, N. ;
Thalib, L. ;
Hughes, A. ;
Tolan, M. ;
Young, V. ;
McGovern, E. .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2008, 56 (08) :449-455
[2]   Smoker's Paradox in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J].
Gupta, Tanush ;
Kolte, Dhaval ;
Khera, Sahil ;
Harikrishnan, Prakash ;
Mujib, Marjan ;
Aronow, Wilbert S. ;
Jain, Diwakar ;
Ahmed, Ali ;
Cooper, Howard A. ;
Frishman, William H. ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Fonarow, Gregg C. ;
Panza, Julio A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (04)
[3]  
Harold JG, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V63, pE57, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014]
[4]   Smoking-Thrombolysis Paradox Recanalization and Reperfusion Rates After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Smokers With Ischemic Stroke [J].
Kufner, Anna ;
Nolte, Christian H. ;
Galinovic, Ivana ;
Brunecker, Peter ;
Kufner, Gerald M. ;
Endres, Matthias ;
Fiebach, Jochen B. ;
Ebinger, Martin .
STROKE, 2013, 44 (02) :407-413
[5]   New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis - Implications for secondary prevention [J].
Palta, S ;
Pai, AM ;
Gill, KS ;
Pai, RG .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (21) :2497-2502
[6]  
Saxena A, 2013, J HEART VALVE DIS, V22, P184