Characterization and structural modelling of humic substances in field soil displaying significant differences from previously proposed structures

被引:51
作者
Albers, C. N. [1 ,2 ]
Banta, G. T. [3 ]
Jacobsen, O. S. [2 ]
Hansen, P. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Roskilde Univ, Dept Sci Syst & Models, Roskilde 4000, Denmark
[2] Geol Survey Denmark & Greenland, Dept Geochem, Copenhagen 1350, Denmark
[3] Roskilde Univ, Dept Environm Social & Spatial Change, Roskilde 4000, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01036.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Humic substances (HS) often are dominant constituents of soil organic matter. In this study 28 fractions of HS were purified and chemically characterized from horizons of three Danish soils differing in texture. A commercial humic acid (HA) was included for comparison. The HS fractions were chemically characterized by CHNS analysis, pH-titration and liquid state C-13-NMR experiments. Amino acids and carbohydrates could clearly be differentiated from other O- and N-aliphatic compounds. The data were analysed by principal component analysis. The analysis revealed greater difference between HS fractions than between locations. The characteristics of the HS fractions were compared with several models in the literature and an average structural model for one HA and one FA fraction is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 705
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Structural components of humic acids as determined by chemical modifications and carbon-13 NMR, pyrolysis-, and thermochemolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
    Chefetz, B
    Salloum, MJ
    Deshmukh, AP
    Hatcher, PG
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (04) : 1159 - 1171
  • [2] Quantitative differences in evaluating soil humic substances by liquid-and solid-state 13C-NMR spectroscopy
    Conte, P
    Piccolo, A
    van Lagen, B
    Buurman, P
    de Jager, PA
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1997, 80 (3-4) : 339 - 352
  • [3] 3-D structural modeling of humic acids through experimental characterization, computer assisted structure elucidation and atomistic simulations. 1. Chelsea soil humic acid
    Diallo, MS
    Simpson, A
    Gassman, P
    Faulon, JL
    Johnson, JH
    Goddard, WA
    Hatcher, PG
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (09) : 1783 - 1793
  • [4] Hydrophobic interactions between spin-label 5-SASL and humic acid as revealed by ESR spectroscopy
    Ferreira, JA
    Nascimento, OR
    Martin-Neto, L
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (04) : 761 - 765
  • [5] FLAIG W, 1975, SOIL COMPONENTS, V1, P1
  • [6] Two-dimensional NMR studies of size fractionated Suwannee River Fulvic and Humic Acid Reference
    Haiber, S
    Herzog, H
    Burba, P
    Gosciniak, B
    Lambert, J
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (21) : 4289 - 4294
  • [7] Hayes M. H. B., 2001, Humic substances and chemical contaminants. Proceedings of a workshop and symposium cosponsored by the International Humic Substances Society, the Soil Science Society of America, and the American Society of Agronomy, Anaheim, USA, 26-27 October 1997, P3
  • [8] Comparative analysis of partial structures of a peat humic and fulvic acid using one- and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Hertkorn, N
    Permin, A
    Perminova, I
    Kovalevskii, D
    Yudov, M
    Petrosyan, V
    Kettrup, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2002, 31 (02) : 375 - 387
  • [9] Synthesis of amino-phenolic humic-like substances and comparison with natural aquatic humic acids: A multi-analytical techniques approach
    Jung, AV
    Frochot, C
    Parant, S
    Lartiges, BS
    Selve, C
    Viriot, ML
    Bersillon, JL
    [J]. ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 36 (09) : 1252 - 1271
  • [10] Kalinowski HO, 1987, CARBON 13 NMR SPECTR