Are You Sure the Library Is That Way? Metacognitive Monitoring of Spatial Judgments

被引:4
作者
Stevens, Christopher A. [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
metacognition; spatial cognition; metamemory; reference frames; perspective taking; REPRESENTATIONS; ACCURACY; OVERCONFIDENCE; ASSOCIATION; ORIENTATION; RETRIEVAL; ABILITY; MEMORY; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0000229
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many studies have examined how people recall the locations of objects in spatial layouts. However, little is known about how people monitor the accuracy of judgments based on those memories. The goal of the present experiments was to examine the effect of reference frame characteristics on metacognitive accuracy for spatial judgments. Reference frame characteristics include the alignment of one's viewpoint with the structure of the environment (allocentric alignment), direction of the target with respect to one's current viewpoint (egocentric direction), and the type of perspective used to solve the task (egocentric vs. allocentric). Participants were tested on their knowledge of a well-known location in which they had experience navigating. They were asked to orient themselves toward a particular heading and point to target landmarks from this heading. They then rated their confidence in their pointing judgments. Confidence judgments were sensitive to the effects of allocentric alignment and egocentric direction on performance. However, they underestimate the magnitude of these effects. Follow-up regression analyses indicate that confidence in individual landmarks was a stronger predictor of confidence than reference frame characteristics. Overall, the results suggest that people use reference frame features and landmark confidence when monitoring performance in directional judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1049
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Alpert M., 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty, P294, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.023
[3]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[4]   OVERCONFIDENCE IN ESTIMATION - TESTING THE ANCHORING-AND-ADJUSTMENT HYPOTHESIS [J].
BLOCK, RA ;
HARPER, DR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 49 (02) :188-207
[5]   The metamemory approach to confidence: A test using semantic memory [J].
Brewer, William F. ;
Sampaio, Cristina .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 67 (01) :59-77
[6]   Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models [J].
Bryant, DJ ;
Tversky, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (01) :137-156
[7]   Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty [J].
Chen, Chien-Hsiung ;
Chang, Wen-Chih ;
Chang, Wen-Te .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 29 (02) :220-226
[8]  
Cohen J., 2013, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[9]   Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women [J].
Dabbs, JM ;
Chang, EL ;
Strong, RA ;
Milun, R .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1998, 19 (02) :89-98
[10]   OBJECT-ARRAY STRUCTURE, FRAMES OF REFERENCE, AND RETRIEVAL OF SPATIAL KNOWLEDGE [J].
EASTON, RD ;
SHOLL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (02) :483-500