Comparison between background concentrations of arsenic in urban and non-urban areas of Florida

被引:32
|
作者
Chirenje, T [1 ]
Ma, LQ
Chen, M
Zillioux, EJ
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Soil & Water Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Florida Power & Light, Juna Beach, FL 33408 USA
来源
ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH | 2003年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
background concentration; natural and anthropogenic; arsenic; Florida;
D O I
10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00138-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arsenic contamination is of great environmental concern due to its toxic effects as a carcinogen. Knowledge of arsenic background concentrations is important for land application of wastes and for making remediation decisions. The soil clean-up target level for arsenic in Florida (0.8 and 3.7 mg kg(-1) for residential and commercial areas, respectively) lies within the range of both background and analytical quantification limits. The objective of this study was to compare arsenic distribution in urban and non-urban areas of Florida. Approximately 440 urban and 448 non-urban Florida soil samples were compared. For urban areas, soil samples were collected from three land-use classes (residential, commercial and public land) in two cities, Gainesville and Miami. For the non-urban areas, samples were collected from relatively undisturbed non-inhabited areas. Arsenic concentrations varied greatly in Gainesville, ranging from 0.21 to approximately 660 mg kg(-1) with a geometric mean (GM) of 0.40 mg kg(-1), which were lower than Miami samples (ranging from 0.32 to 112 mg kg(-1); GM=2.81 mg kg(-1)). Arsenic background concentrations in urban soils were significantly greater and showed greater variation than those from relatively undisturbed non-urban soils (GM=0.27 mg kg(-1)) in general. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Protocol development for assessing arsenic background concentrations in Florida urban soils
    Chirenje, T
    Ma, LQ
    Hornsby, AG
    Portier, K
    Harris, W
    Latimer, S
    Zillioux, EJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2001, 2 (02) : 141 - 153
  • [3] Historical differences in temperature between urban and non-urban areas in Puerto Rico
    Torres-Valcarcel, Angel R.
    Harbor, Jonathan
    Torres-Valcarcel, Ana L.
    Gonzalez-Aviles, Cesar J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (07) : 1648 - 1661
  • [4] HIGH OZONE CONCENTRATIONS IN NON-URBAN ATMOSPHERES
    RIPPERTON, LA
    SICKLES, JE
    EATON, WC
    DECKER, CE
    BACH, WD
    ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, 1975, (17): : 174 - 186
  • [5] JUDICIOUS DISTRIBUTION OF PEDODONTISTS TO NON-URBAN AREAS
    WALDMAN, HB
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1984, 51 (03): : 177 - 183
  • [6] Characterization of particulate air pollution in urban and non-urban areas in the Netherlands
    Van der Zee, SC
    Hoek, G
    Harssema, H
    Brunekreef, B
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (21) : 3717 - 3729
  • [8] COMPARISON OF ATMOSPHERIC COARSE PARTICLES AT AN URBAN AND NON-URBAN SITE
    NOLL, KE
    PONTIUS, A
    FREY, R
    GOULD, M
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (11) : 1931 - 1943
  • [9] An advanced algorithm for deformation estimation in non-urban areas
    Goel, Kanika
    Adam, Nico
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 73 : 100 - 110
  • [10] Comparison of frog assemblages between urban and non-urban habitats in the upper Blue Mountains of Australia
    Lane, Alan
    Burgin, Shelley
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (12) : 2484 - 2493