Simulation in disaster nursing education: A scoping review

Objectives: Disasters are gradually increasing in type and frequency throughout the globe. Simulation is being used in disaster nursing teaching and training. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and application of simulation in disaster nursing education. Design, data sources and methods: A scoping review was conducted using the model of Arksey and O'Malley as the methodological framework, extended by Levac. The following databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsychINFO from the launch of the databases to June 14, 2020, with a supplemental search on October 12, 2020. Two researchers independently screened the relevant articles selected and extracted the data. Results: Twenty-four studies were included in the scoping review. The research purpose varied widely. The 24 included studies examined nine disaster simulation scenarios. Eight types of simulation methods were identified, of which simulated patients and a mixed-simulation approach were the main methods. Only two studies used a randomized controlled trial design, and none of the rest studies were set up with control groups. Only 10 studies reported validated questionnaires with reliability tests being used. Debriefing was performed in 19 studies, and in 4 of those studies, the debriefing was structured. The reported outcomes were concentrated in Kirkpatrick's levels 1 (participants' satisfaction with the training experience) and 2 (whether participants actually benefited from the training). Conclusion: This review found that simulation was well-recognised in disaster nursing education and training. However, insufficient designs and methods indicated that there was a lack of strong evidence, and high-level research on the application of simulation is needed in the field of disaster care.