Population genomics of free-ranging Great Plains white-tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization

被引:9
作者
Combe, Fraser J. [1 ]
Jaster, Levi [2 ]
Ricketts, Andrew [3 ]
Haukos, David [4 ]
Hope, Andrew G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Div Biol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas Dept Wildlife & Pk, Topeka, KS USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Hort & Nat Sci, Wildlife & Outdoor Enterprise Management, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Div Biol, US Geol Survey, Kansas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
来源
EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS | 2022年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
conservation genomics; double-digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing; genetic diversity; migration; single nucleotide polymorphisms; wildlife management; CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA ANALYSIS; GENE FLOW; INTROGRESSIVE HYBRIDIZATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HYBRID ZONE; R-PACKAGE; ODOCOILEUS; CONSERVATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/eva.13330
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Hybridization is a natural process at species-range boundaries that may variably promote the speciation process or break down species barriers but minimally will influence management outcomes of distinct populations. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) have broad and overlapping distributions in North America and a recognized capacity for interspecific hybridization. In response to contemporary environmental change to any of one or multiple still-unknown factors, mule deer range is contracting westward accompanied by a westward expansion of white-tailed deer, leading to increasing interactions, opportunities for gene flow, and associated conservation implications. To quantify genetic diversity, phylogenomic structure, and dynamics of hybridization in sympatric populations of white-tailed and mule deer, we used mitochondrial cytochrome b data coupled with SNP loci discovered with double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing. We recovered 25,018 SNPs across 92 deer samples from both species, collected from two regions of western Kansas. Eight individuals with unambiguous external morphology representing both species were of hybrid origin (8.7%), and represented the product of multi-generational backcrossing. Mitochondrial data showed both ancient and recent directional discordance with morphological species assignments, reflecting a legacy of mule deer males mating with white-tailed deer females. Mule deer had lower genetic diversity than white-tailed deer, and both mitochondrial and nuclear data suggest contemporary mule deer effective population decline. Landscape genetic analyses show relative isolation between the two study regions for white-tailed deer, but greater connectivity among mule deer, with predominant movement from north to south. Collectively, our results suggest a long history of gene flow between these species in the Great Plains and hint at evolutionary processes that purge incompatible functional genomic elements as a result of hybridization. Surviving hybrids evidently may be reproductive, but with unknown consequences for the future integrity of these species, population trajectories, or relative susceptibility to emerging pathogens.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 131
页数:21
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Hybridization and speciation
    Abbott, R.
    Albach, D.
    Ansell, S.
    Arntzen, J. W.
    Baird, S. J. E.
    Bierne, N.
    Boughman, Janette W.
    Brelsford, A.
    Buerkle, C. A.
    Buggs, R.
    Butlin, R. K.
    Dieckmann, U.
    Eroukhmanoff, F.
    Grill, A.
    Cahan, S. H.
    Hermansen, J. S.
    Hewitt, G.
    Hudson, A. G.
    Jiggins, C.
    Jones, J.
    Keller, B.
    Marczewski, T.
    Mallet, J.
    Martinez-Rodriguez, P.
    Moest, M.
    Mullen, S.
    Nichols, R.
    Nolte, A. W.
    Parisod, C.
    Pfennig, K.
    Rice, A. M.
    Ritchie, M. G.
    Seifert, B.
    Smadja, C. M.
    Stelkens, R.
    Szymura, J. M.
    Vainola, R.
    Wolf, J. B. W.
    Zinner, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (02) : 229 - 246
  • [2] Genomics and the future of conservation genetics
    Allendorf, Fred W.
    Hohenlohe, Paul A.
    Luikart, Gordon
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (10) : 697 - 709
  • [3] Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals
    Allendorf, Fred W.
    Hard, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 : 9987 - 9994
  • [4] The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines
    Allendorf, FW
    Leary, RF
    Spruell, P
    Wenburg, JK
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (11) : 613 - 622
  • [5] ANDERSON R C, 1972, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, V8, P304
  • [6] Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics
    Andrews, Kimberly R.
    Good, Jeffrey M.
    Miller, Michael R.
    Luikart, Gordon
    Hohenlohe, Paul A.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2016, 17 (02) : 81 - 92
  • [7] Balkenhol N., 2019, Population Genomics, P261, DOI DOI 10.1007/1383620172
  • [8] ALLOZYME AND MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA ANALYSIS OF A HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN WHITE-TAILED DEER AND MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS) IN WEST TEXAS
    BALLINGER, SW
    BLANKENSHIP, LH
    BICKHAM, JW
    CARR, SM
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS, 1992, 30 (1-2) : 1 - 11
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF HYBRID ZONES
    BARTON, NH
    HEWITT, GM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1985, 16 : 113 - 148
  • [10] ADAPTATION, SPECIATION AND HYBRID ZONES
    BARTON, NH
    HEWITT, GM
    [J]. NATURE, 1989, 341 (6242) : 497 - 503