Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta-analysis

被引:382
作者
Opris, David [1 ]
Pintea, Sebastian [1 ]
Garcia-Palacios, Azucena [2 ]
Botella, Cristina [2 ]
Szamoskoezi, Stefan [3 ]
David, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Babes Bolyai, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Cluj Napoca 400015, Romania
[2] Jaume I Univ, Dept Basic & Clin Psychol & Psychobiol, Castellon De La Plana, Spain
[3] Univ Babes Bolyai, Dept Appl Psychol, Cluj Napoca 400015, Romania
[4] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Oncol Sci, New York, NY USA
关键词
treatment efficacy; waiting list; evidence-based practice; long-term effect; randomized controlled trial; behavior therapy; cognitive behavior therapy; IN-VIVO EXPOSURE; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; FOLLOW-UP; MENTAL-DISORDERS; PANIC DISORDER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; FEAR; PHOBIA; AGORAPHOBIA; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/da.20910
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is a promising intervention for the treatment of the anxiety disorders. The main objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of VRET, used in a behavioral or cognitive-behavioral framework, with that of the classical evidence-based treatments, in anxiety disorders. A comprehensive search of the literature identified 23 studies (n = 608) that were included in the final analysis. The results show that in the case of anxiety disorders, (1) VRET does far better than the waitlist control; (2) the post-treatment results show similar efficacy between the behavioral and the cognitive behavioral interventions incorporating a virtual reality exposure component and the classical evidence-based interventions, with no virtual reality exposure component; (3) VRET has a powerful real-life impact, similar to that of the classical evidence-based treatments; (4) VRET has a good stability of results over time, similar to that of the classical evidence-based treatments; (5) there is a doseresponse relationship for VRET; and (6) there is no difference in the dropout rate between the virtual reality exposure and the in vivo exposure. Implications are discussed. Depression and Anxiety 0:19, 2011. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P21
[2]  
[Anonymous], METAANALYSIS CALCULA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB COGNITIVE BEHAV
[5]   Virtual reality exposure in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia:: A controlled study [J].
Botella, C. ;
Garcia-Palacios, A. ;
Villa, H. ;
Banos, R. M. ;
Quero, S. ;
Alcaniz, M. ;
Riva, G. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2007, 14 (03) :164-175
[6]   The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses [J].
Butler, AC ;
Chapman, JE ;
Forman, EM ;
Beck, AT .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) :17-31
[7]   Effects of group experiential cognitive therapy for the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia [J].
Choi, YH ;
Vincelli, F ;
Riva, G ;
Wiedorhold, BK ;
Lee, JH ;
Park, KH .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 8 (04) :387-393
[8]   Treatment of specific phobia in adults [J].
Choy, Yujuan ;
Fyer, Abby J. ;
Lipsitz, Josh D. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 27 (03) :266-286
[9]   PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS VS DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF PANIC [J].
CLUM, GA .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1989, 20 (03) :429-457
[10]   Cognitive and behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders: A review of meta-analytic finding [J].
Deacon, BJ ;
Abramowitz, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 60 (04) :429-441