Scale Difference from the Impact of Disease Control on Pig Production Efficiency

被引:8
作者
Hu, Yaguan [1 ]
Yu, Yanli [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, Peoples R China
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 19期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
disease control; data envelopment analysis; productivity; threshold regression; ANIMAL-WELFARE; FARMERS; MANAGEMENT; PREVENTION; MOUTH; MEAT; BIOSECURITY; STRATEGIES; ADOPTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/ani12192647
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary This paper uses the data of fixed observation points in the country's rural areas, the Data Envelopment Analysis model is used to calculate the production efficiency of pig farmers, which shows the efficiency level of pig breeding in the country. Then, the Tobit model is used to analyze that epidemic prevention and control has a positive effect on production efficiency. Finally, the threshold regression model was used to analyze the results: the effect of disease control on production efficiency was different under different breeding scales. When the breeding scale was less than 6.0002, the disease control had a negative impact on the production efficiency. When the breeding scale was greater than 12.9994, the disease control had a positive impact on the production efficiency. The research results of this paper not only help farmers to correctly understand the relationship between epidemic prevention and production efficiency, guide farmers to expand their breeding scale, and actively participate in epidemic prevention and control, but also provide a reference for the government to formulate policies according to different scales to guide farmers to carry out epidemic prevention and control. Epidemic disease prevention plays a critical role in ensuring the healthy development of livestock farming, and the subjective willingness of breeders can be affected by the cost of epidemic disease prevention. To correct the misconception that farmers regard the cost of disease control as an ineffective cost, and to promote the healthy development of the pig breeding industry, our study employed the data envelopment analysis super-efficiency model and panel threshold regression model to evaluate the combination of the cost of epidemic disease prevention and swine productivity using data collected from 1998-2018 across 30 provinces in China. The following results were obtained. (1) The cost of epidemic disease prevention generated a non-linear on swine productivity when the swine farming scale was limited; (2) When the number of animals at the beginning of the year was less than 6.0002, swine productivity was impacted negatively; (3) When the number of animals at the beginning of the year ranged between 6.0002 and 12.9994, the impact was insignificant; (4) A strong correlation was observed between the expenses of epidemic disease prevention and animal productivity when the number of animals at the beginning of the year exceeded 12.9994. These results indicate that publicity should be enhanced to elucidate the combination of epidemic disease prevention and swine productivity among breeders. In addition, the government should introduce relevant policies to encourage the development of large-scale pig farming, such as subsidies for the construction of large-scale farms and insurance.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Alarcon P., 2013, Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. Proceedings of a meeting held in Madrid, Spain, 20-22 March 2013, P211
  • [2] Immunoprophylaxis in intensive farming systems: the way forward
    Amadori, Massimo
    Zanotti, Cinzia
    [J]. VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 181 : 2 - 9
  • [3] Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs towards Implementing Cattle Disease Prevention and Control Measures: A Qualitative Study with Dairy Farmers in Great Britain
    Brennan, Marnie L.
    Wright, Nick
    Wapenaar, Wendela
    Jarratt, Susanne
    Hobson-West, Pru
    Richens, Imogen F.
    Kaler, Jasmeet
    Buchanan, Heather
    Huxley, Jonathan N.
    O'Connor, Heather M.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [4] Biosecurity on Cattle Farms: A Study in North-West England
    Brennan, Marnie L.
    Christley, Robert M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (01):
  • [5] Cai Q., 2021, P INT C AGR ECONOMIS
  • [6] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [7] Diversity of pig farming styles: understanding how it is structured
    Commandeur, MAM
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2006, 54 (01) : 111 - 127
  • [8] Cuiping X., 2022, J HAINAN U HUMANIT S, V40, P140
  • [9] Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention Investments to prevent tropical deforestation and to limit wildlife trade will protect against future zoonosis outbreaks
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Hannah, Lee
    Kaufman, Les
    Ahumada, Jorge A.
    Ando, Amy W.
    Bernstein, Aaron
    Busch, Jonah
    Daszak, Peter
    Engelmann, Jens
    Kinnaird, Margaret F.
    Li, Binbin V.
    Loch-Temzelides, Ted
    Lovejoy, Thomas
    Nowak, Katarzyna
    Roehrdanz, Patrick R.
    Vale, Mariana M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 369 (6502) : 379 - +
  • [10] "It's just the luck of the draw": Luck, good farming and the management of animal disease in Aotearoa New Zealand
    Enticott, Gareth
    Gates, M. Carolyn
    Hidano, Arata
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2021, 119 : 143 - 151