Active ERP implementation management: A real options perspective

被引:50
作者
Wu, Liang-Chuan [1 ]
Ong, Chorng-Shyong [1 ]
Hsu, Yao-Wen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Informat Management, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Int Business, Taipei 106, Taiwan
关键词
active management; ERP implementation; real options; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2007.10.004
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although enterprise resources planning (ERP) implementation has been one of the most significant challenges of the last decade, it comes with a surprisingly high failure rate due to its high risk nature. The risks of ERP implementation, which involve both technical and social uncertainties, must to be effectively managed. Traditional ERP practices address the implementation of ERP as a static process. Such practices focus on structure, not on ERP as something that will meet the needs of a changing organization. As a result, many relevant uncertainties that cannot be predefined are not accommodated, and cause the implementation fail in the form of project delay and cost overruns. The objective of this paper is to propose an active ERP implementation management perspective to manage ERP risks based on the Real Options (RO) theory, which addresses uncertainties over time, resolves uncertainties in changing environments that cannot be predefined. By actively managing ERP implementation, managers can improve their flexibility, take appropriate action to respond to the often-changing ERP environment, and achieve a more successful ERP implementation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1050
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system [J].
Abdinnour-Helm, S ;
Lengnick-Hall, ML ;
Lengnick-Hall, CA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 146 (02) :258-273
[2]   An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment [J].
Amoako-Gyampah, K ;
Salam, AF .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2004, 41 (06) :731-745
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Industrial Management
[4]   Supporting risks in software project management [J].
Barros, MD ;
Werner, CML ;
Travassos, GH .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2004, 70 (1-2) :21-35
[5]   A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments [J].
Benaroch, M ;
Kauffman, RJ .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (01) :70-86
[6]   Justifying electronic banking network expansion using real options analysis [J].
Benaroch, M ;
Kauffman, RJ .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2000, 24 (02) :197-225
[7]   Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systerns [J].
Benders, J ;
Batenburg, R ;
van der Blonk, H .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 43 (02) :194-203
[8]   Profile distance method- a multi-attribute decision making approach for information system investments [J].
Bernroider, Edward W. N. ;
Stix, Volker .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (02) :988-998
[9]   Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation [J].
Bingi, P ;
Sharma, MK ;
Godla, JK .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 16 (03) :7-14
[10]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654