Target setting in data envelopment analysis: efficiency improvement models with predefined inputs/outputs

被引:10
作者
Ibrahim, Mustapha Daruwana [1 ]
Daneshvar, Sahand [2 ]
Guden, Huseyin [2 ]
Vizvari, Bela [2 ]
机构
[1] Higher Coll Technol, Fac Engn, Ind Engn Technol, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Via Mersin 10, Famagusta, Turkey
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency improvement; Predefined input; Predefined outputs; Target setting; DISTANCE FUNCTION; DEA; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY; FRONTIER; OUTPUTS; RETURN;
D O I
10.1007/s12597-020-00462-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In managerial decisions, situations frequently arise when decision makers need to define their capabilities, desires, and limitations when trying to improve efficiency. In this paper, target setting models that accommodate predefined desired output targets or predefined available inputs during efficiency improvement in data envelopment analysis are proposed. The proposed approach guarantees efficient targets when inefficient or weak efficient units' desire expansion or reduction in outputs/inputs, and cases of input/output redistribution, or nondiscretionary variables in a production system. The approach is applied to two empirical studies, first, on a poultry chain trying to improve efficiency of some branches, and second on water, energy, land and food nexus trying to attain future sustainability based on preexisting inputs. Results of the empirical studies supports the proposed models.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1336
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A combined goal programming and inverse DEA method for target setting in mergers [J].
Amin, Gholam R. ;
Al-Muharrami, Saeed ;
Toloo, Mehdi .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 115 :412-417
[2]   DEA-based indicator for performance improvement [J].
Aoki, S ;
Naito, Y ;
Tsuji, H .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACTIVE MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (AMT 2005), 2005, :327-330
[3]   Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA [J].
Aparicio, Juan ;
Ruiz, Jose L. ;
Sirvent, Inmaculada .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2007, 28 (03) :209-218
[4]   The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure [J].
Baek, Chulwoo ;
Lee, Jeong-dong .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2009, 49 (1-2) :265-275
[5]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[8]   Improved efficiency measures through directional distance formulation of data envelopment analysis [J].
Diabat, Ali ;
Shetty, Udaya ;
Pakkala, T. P. M. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 229 (01) :325-346
[9]   MEASURING PLANT-CAPACITY, UTILIZATION AND TECHNICAL CHANGE - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
FARE, R ;
GROSSKOPF, S ;
KOKKELENBERG, EC .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1989, 30 (03) :655-666
[10]   Hyperbolic efficiency and return to the dollar [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Zaim, O .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 136 (03) :671-679