Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method

被引:52
|
作者
Byrum, CE
MacFall, JR
Charles, HC
Chitilla, VR
Boyko, OB
Upchurch, L
Smith, JS
Rajagopalan, P
Passe, T
Kim, D
Xanthakos, S
Ranga, K
Krishnan, R
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,DURHAM,NC 27710
[2] DUKE UNIV,SCH MED,DURHAM,NC 27710
关键词
semiautomated; volumetric; signal intensity; seeding; stereologic point counting;
D O I
10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the human brain in vivo. As MR imaging resolution has improved, precise measurement of small brain structures has become possible. Methods of measuring brain regions from MR images include both manual and semiautomated methods. Despite the development of numerous volumetric methods, there have been only limited attempts so far to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. In this study we used phantoms to assess the accuracy of the segmentation process. Our results with simple and complex phantoms indicate an error of 3-5% using either manual or semiautomated techniques. We subsequently used manual and semiautomated volumetric methodologies to study human brain structures in vivo in five normal subjects. Supervised segmentation is a semiautomated method that accomplishes the division of MR images into several tissue types based on differences in signal intensity. This technique requires the operator to manually identify points on the MR images that characterize each tissue type, a process known as seeding. However, the use of supervised segmentation to assess the volumes of gray and white matter is subject to pitfalls. Inhomogeneities of the radiofrequency or magnetic fields can result in misclassification of tissue points during the tissue seeding process, limiting the accuracy and reliability of the segmentation process. We used a structured seeding protocol that allowed for field inhomogeneity that produced reduced variation in measured tissue volumes. We used repeated segmentations to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, and were able to measure small and large regions of interest with a small degree of variation. In addition, we demonstrated that measurements are reproducible with repeat MR acquisitions, with minimal interscan variability. Segmentation methods can accurately and reliably measure subtle morphometric changes, and will prove a boon to the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 234
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Brain Tissue Segmentation from Magnetic Resonance Brain Images Using Histogram Based Swarm Optimization Techniques
    Thiruvasagam, Priya
    Palanisamy, Kalavathi
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (06) : 752 - 765
  • [22] A robust statistical method for brain magnetic resonance image segmentation
    Qin, B
    Wen, JH
    Chen, M
    PROGRESS IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, IMAGE ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3773 : 51 - 58
  • [23] Conjugate Gradient Method for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Segmentation
    Guerrout, EL-Hachemi
    Ait-Aoudia, Samy
    Michelucci, Dominique
    Mahiou, Ramdane
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 522 : 561 - 572
  • [24] An unsupervised learning method with a clustering approach for tumor identification and tissue segmentation in magnetic resonance brain images
    Vishnuvarthanan, G.
    Rajasekaran, M. Pallikonda
    Subbaraj, P.
    Vishnuvarthanan, Anitha
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 38 : 190 - 212
  • [25] Accuracy and Reproducibility of Adipose Tissue Measurements in Young Infants by Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bauer, Jan Stefan
    Noel, Peter Benjamin
    Vollhardt, Christiane
    Much, Daniela
    Degirmenci, Saliha
    Brunner, Stefanie
    Rummeny, Ernst Josef
    Hauner, Hans
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [26] Reproducibility Evaluation of SLANT Whole Brain Segmentation Across Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols
    Xiong, Yunxi
    Huo, Yuankai
    Wang, Jiachen
    Davis, L. Taylor
    McHugo, Maureen
    Landman, Bennett A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2019, 10949
  • [27] Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images of Brain using Thresholding Techniques
    Dogra, Jyotsna
    Sood, Meenakshi
    Jain, Shruti
    Parashar, Navdeep
    PROCEEDINGS OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTING AND CONTROL (ISPCC 2K17), 2017, : 311 - 315
  • [28] Inhomogeneous Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Segmentation Using a Novel Double Level Set Method
    Song, Jianhua
    Li, Shuqin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020, 10 (10) : 2452 - 2458
  • [29] Negative symptoms and frontal brain tissue volumes in schizophrenia -: A magnetic resonance imaging study
    Nesvag, R.
    Varnas, K.
    Lawyer, G.
    Jonsson, E. G.
    Agartz, I.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (02) : 349 - 349
  • [30] Fuzzy clustering approach for brain tumor tissue segmentation in magnetic resonance images
    Iván A. Rodríguez-Méndez
    Raquel. Ureña
    Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 10105 - 10117