An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setubal Peninsula, Portugal

被引:105
作者
Pires, Ana [1 ]
Chang, Ni-Bin [2 ]
Martinho, Graca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Dept Ciencias & Engn Ambiente, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Waste management; Uncertainty; Multi-criteria decision making; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable decisions; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; SELECTION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent challenges in solid waste management in Europe are intimately tied to the fulfillment of the prescribed targets of recycling and organic waste recovery in response to the requirements of European Directives. Challenges with characterizing and propagating uncertainty, and validating predictions permeate decision making. In order to retrieve the societal ramifications in decision making, this study integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for alternative screening and ranking to help decision makers in a Portuguese waste management system. To underscore the role of uncertainty in decision making for alternative ranking, a fuzzy interval multi-attribute decision analysis was carried out to aid in environmental policy decisions. While AHP was used to determine the essential weighting factors, screening and ranking was carried out by TOPSIS under uncertainty expressed by using an interval-valued fuzzy (IVF) method. Such an AHP-based IVF-TOPSIS approach driven by a set of weighting factors associated with the selected criteria has been proven useful for final ranking via an iterative procedure. The practical implementation was assessed by a case study in Setubal Peninsula, Portugal for the selection of the best waste management practices under an uncertain environment, which is geared toward the target fulfillment in the future. (C) 2011 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 21
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus [J].
Rousis, K. ;
Moustakas, K. ;
Malamis, S. ;
Papadopoulos, A. ;
Loizidou, M. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (10) :1941-1954
[42]   THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS [J].
ROY, B .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1991, 31 (01) :49-73
[43]  
Roy B., 1973, Multiple Criteria Decision-Making, P179
[44]   Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP) [J].
Thomas L. Saaty .
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004, 13 (1) :1-35
[45]  
Saaty TL, 2001, MODELS METHODS CONCE
[46]  
Saaty TL, 1980, The analytic hierarchy process, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780429504419-2, 10.21236/ADA214804, DOI 10.21236/ADA214804]
[47]   ADAPTATION OF TOPSIS DECISION MAKING APPROACH FOR LINGUISTIC VARIABLES [J].
Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M. ;
Lamata, M. Teresa .
INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2010, :287-+
[48]  
SPV, 2010, SOC PONT VERD CONTR
[49]  
Tahriri F, 2008, SURANAREE J SCI TECH, V15, P201
[50]  
Tsilemou K., 2004, P ISWA WORLD ENV C E