Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests

被引:128
|
作者
Wagner, Valentin [1 ]
Bayer, Peter [2 ]
Kuebert, Markus [3 ]
Blum, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] KIT, Inst Appl Geosci AGW, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tewag Technol Erdwarmeanlagen Umweltschutz GmbH, D-72181 Starzach Felldorf, Germany
关键词
Geothermal energy; Thermal response test; Thermal conductivity; Geothermal gradient; Thermal dispersivity; BOREHOLE HEAT-EXCHANGERS; GROUNDWATER-FLOW; PUMP SYSTEMS; IN-SITU; CONDUCTIVITY; RESISTANCE; CAPACITY; STORAGE; PLUMES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thermal conductivity and thermal borehole resistance are basic parameters for the technical and sustainable design of closed ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems. One of the most common methods to determine these parameters is the thermal response test (TRT). The response data measured are typically evaluated by the Kelvin line source equation which does not consider all relevant processes of heat transfer in the subsurface. The approach only considers conductive heat transfer from the borehole heat exchanger (BHE) and all transport effects are combined in the parameters of effective thermal conductivity and thermal borehole resistance. In order to examine primary effects in more detail, a sensitivity study based on numerically generated TRT data sets is performed considering the effects of (1) the in-situ position of the U-shaped pipes of borehole heat exchangers (shank spacing), (2) a non-uniform initial thermal distribution (such as a geothermal gradient), and (3) thermal dispersivity. It will be demonstrated that the shank spacing and the non-uniform initial thermal distribution have minor effects (less than 10%) on the effective thermal conductivity and the determined borehole resistance. Constant groundwater velocity with varying thermal dispersivity values, however, has a significant influence on the thermal borehole resistance. These effects are even more pronounced for interpreted effective thermal conductivity which is overestimated by a factor of 1.2-2.9 compared to the real thermal conductivity of the saturated porous media. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deconvolution and convolution methods for thermal response tests on borehole heat exchangers
    Beier, Richard A.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2020, 86
  • [42] Insights into parameter estimation for thermal response tests on borehole heat exchangers
    Beier, Richard A.
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 25 (08) : 947 - 962
  • [43] Impact of groundwater flow on thermal response tests in heterogeneous geological settings
    Previati, Alberto
    Crosta, Giovanni
    GEOTHERMICS, 2025, 127
  • [44] Evaluation of Subsurface Heat Capacity through Oscillatory Thermal Response Tests
    Giordano, Nicolo
    Lamarche, Louis
    Raymond, Jasmin
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (18)
  • [45] Thermal response test numerical modeling using a dynamic simulator
    Focaccia S.
    Geothermal Energy, 1 (1)
  • [46] A new method for analysis of constant-temperature thermal response tests
    Aydin, Murat
    Onur, Mustafa
    Sisman, Altug
    GEOTHERMICS, 2019, 78 : 1 - 8
  • [47] Oscillatory thermal response tests to estimate the ground thermal diffusivity
    Lamarche, Louis
    Raymond, Jasmin
    Giordano, Nicolo
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 353
  • [48] Improved method and case study of thermal response test for borehole heat exchangers of ground source heat pump system
    Wang, Huajun
    Qi, Chengying
    Du, Hongpu
    Gu, Jihao
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (03) : 727 - 733
  • [49] Experimental and numerical investigation of a long-duration Thermal Response Test: Borehole Heat Exchanger behaviour and thermal plume in the heterogeneous rock mass
    Radioti, G.
    Cerfontaine, B.
    Charlier, R.
    Nguyen, F.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2018, 71 : 245 - 258
  • [50] Simulation of thermal response tests in a layered subsurface
    Raymond, J.
    Lamarche, L.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 109 : 293 - 301