Validation of Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ) in the Taiwanese Population - Concurrent Validity with Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module

被引:6
作者
Hsieh, Meng-Hsueh [1 ]
Chen, Yu-Ching [2 ]
Ho, Chun-Heng [1 ]
Lin, Chung-Ying [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Planning & Design, Dept Ind Design, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Allied Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Biostat Consulting Ctr, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tainan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Inst Allied Hlth Sci, Coll Med,Dept Publ Hlth,Dept Occupat Therapy,Bios, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
diabetes mellitus; knowledge; diabetes care; self-care; psychometrics; HEALTH LITERACY; BEHAVIORS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2147/DMSO.S369552
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Diabetes knowledge is important for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) to improve their health. Therefore, it is important to validate an instrument for assessing diabetes knowledge. The present study aimed to validate the 24-item DiabetesPatients and Methods: The 24-item DKQ and Diabetes-specific Quality of Life Module (DMQoL) were administered to 425 patients (mean +/- SD age=58.4 +/- 11.6) with type 2 DM.Results: The 24-item DKQ was first examined for its factor structure using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Items with low factors loadings were removed and 18 items were retained to make a DKQ-18. In DKQ-18, five factors were identified, which were named as diabetes etiology and symptoms (F1), intermediate nursing (F2), complications (F3), diet and treatment (F4), and elementary nursing (F5). The DKQ-18 had satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha= 0.732 and McDonald's omega=0.748), good known-group validity (participants with a higher level of education showed better score in DKQ-18; participants with HbA1c <= 7 had better score in DKQ-18 compared to group of HbA1c level >8.5), acceptable test-retest reliability (r=0.69), adequate responsiveness (DKQ-18 can detect knowledge change), and concurrent validity with DMQoL. Conclusion: The DKQ-18 is a valid measure for assessing diabetes knowledge. The DKQ-18 could evaluate participants' diabetes knowledge and improve their diabetes knowledge and self-care through a diabetes team and serve as a tool to evaluate the knowledge of participants with type 2 DM.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2403
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[2]  
American Diabetes Association, 2022, Clin Diabetes, V40, P10, DOI 10.2337/cd22-as01
[3]  
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, DIABETES CARE, V45, pS83
[4]  
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, DIABETES CARE, V45, pS185
[5]  
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2021, DIABETES CARE, V45, pS175
[6]   Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Glycemic Control and Its Associated Factors among Diabetes Mellitus Patients [J].
Asmelash, Daniel ;
Abdu, Netsanet ;
Tefera, Samson ;
Baynes, Habtamu Wondifraw ;
Derbew, Cherie .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2019, 2019
[7]   The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years: a cost-of-illness study [J].
Bommer, Christian ;
Heesemann, Esther ;
Sagalova, Vera ;
Manne-Goehler, Jennifer ;
Atun, Rifat ;
Barnighausen, Till ;
Vollmer, Sebastian .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 5 (06) :423-430
[8]   Psychometric Properties of the Urdu Version of Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire [J].
Bukhsh, Allah ;
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey ;
Pusparajah, Priyia ;
Khan, Amer Hayat ;
Khan, Tahir Mehmood .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 5
[9]   Validation of diabetes knowledge questionnaire in Croatian with assessment of diabetes knowledge and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Cacic, Miroslav ;
Kruljac, Ivan ;
Mirosevic, Gorana ;
Vrkljan, Milan .
CLINICAL DIABETOLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) :387-393
[10]   Development of the Family Stigma Stress Scale (FSSS) for Detecting Stigma Stress in Caregivers of People With Mental Illness [J].
Chang, Chih-Cheng ;
Su, Jian-An ;
Chang, Kun-Chia ;
Lin, Chung-Ying ;
Koschorke, Mirja ;
Ruesch, Nicolas ;
Thornicroft, Graham .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2019, 42 (02) :148-168