Characteristics of Crassostrea ariakensis (Fujita 1913) and Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791) in the discharge area of a nuclear power plant in central Chesapeake Bay

被引:0
|
作者
Mclean, Richard I. [2 ]
Abbe, George R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Morgan State Univ, Estuarine Res Ctr, St Leonard, MD 20685 USA
[2] Maryland Dept Nat Resources, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH | 2008年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
Crassostrea ariakensis; Crassostrea virginica; Chesapeake Bay; nuclear; meat condition; Polydora; predation; Suminoe oyster;
D O I
10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[517:COCAFA]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Since 1978, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources has investigated the uptake and deputation by C. virginica of radionuclides released by the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP), which is located on the western shore of Chesapeake Bay in southern Maryland. This ongoing program presented a unique opportunity to compare radionuclide transfer dynamics and other parameters such as growth, mortality, disease status, and pleat condition for Crassostrea virginica and C. ariakensis in a side-by-side, in-situ environmental setting. Introducing the Asian oyster, C. ariakensis, into Chesapeake Bay has been proposed to help restore an oyster population to historical levels, to enhance the Bay ecosystem, and to contribute to the revival of the commercial oyster fishery. The population of the indigenous C. virginica has declined dramatically throughout the bay in part as a result of infection by two non-native protozoan parasites that cause MSX (Haplosporidium nelsoni) and Dermo (Perkinsus marinus) diseases. Other factors including habitat loss, reduced water quality, and overfishing have also reduced population size. Crassostrea ariakensis is known to be more tolerant to these diseases and thus may have greater potential for survival and growth in Chesapeake Bay than the native oyster. Triploid C. ariakensis and diploid C. virginica were immersed in cages in the vicinity of the CCNPP discharge for two exposure periods between July and December 2004. After retrieval, oysters were analyzed for radionuclide concentrations, growth rate, mortality, disease status, and meat condition. Fouling of oysters and cages was also observed. Quantities of radionuclides released by the CCNPP for both exposure periods were insufficient to produce detectable concentrations in either C. virginica or C. ariakensis, precluding a comparison of uptake of Co58, Co60, or Ag110 m, radionuclides that have been detectable historically. Shell lengths were not significantly different between the two species for the two sampling periods, despite the fact that there were considerable age differences between them, but C. ariakensis did show a greater rate of growth. Meat weights and condition indices for C. ariakensis were significantly greater than for C. virginica (P < 0.01). Mortality and Dermo prevalence and intensity were also significantly greater for C. virginica than for C. ariakensis (P < 0.01). Although quantities of radionuclides were insufficient to produce detectable concentrations in either species, this study provided a unique opportunity to examine C. ariakensis in an area of the Maryland Chesapeake Bay where C. ariakensis has not previously been observed.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 523
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Comparative microbial dynamics in Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791) and Crassostrea ariakensis (Fujita 1913)
    Mcghee, Tanya J.
    Morris, James A., Jr.
    Noble, Rachel T.
    Fowler, Patricia K.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2008, 27 (03): : 559 - 565
  • [2] A comparative field study of Crassostrea ariakensis (Fujita 1913) and Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791) in relation to salinity in Virginia
    Calvo, GW
    Luckenbach, MW
    Allen, SK
    Burreson, EM
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2001, 20 (01): : 221 - 229
  • [3] Application of molecular tools for the survey of bacterial pathogens associated with Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791) and Crassostrea ariakensis (Fujita 1913)
    Alavi, Mohammad R.
    Schott, Eric J.
    Saito, Keiko
    Vasta, Gerardo R.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2008, 27 (03): : 551 - 558
  • [4] SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF TRIPLOID CRASSOSTREA VIRGINICA (GMELIN, 1791) AND C-ARIAKENSIS (FUJITA, 1913) IN BOTTOM ENVIRONMENTS OF CHESAPEAKE BAY: IMPLICATIONS FOR AN INTRODUCTION
    Kingsley-Smith, Peter R.
    Harwell, Heather D.
    Kellogg, M. Lisa
    Allen, Steven M.
    Allen, Standish K., Jr.
    Meritt, Donald W.
    Paynter, Kennedy T.
    Luckenbach, Mark W.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2009, 28 (02): : 169 - 184
  • [5] Diploid Crassostrea virginica and Crassostrea ariakensis studies in mesocosms simulating chesapeake bay and Florida estuaries
    Kelly, Christopher J.
    Newell, Roger I. E.
    Scarpa, John
    Laramore, Susan E.
    Carnegie, Ryan B.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2008, 27 (04): : 1020 - 1020
  • [6] Relative susceptibility of Crassostrea virginica and Crassostrea ariakensis to mesohaline predators from Chesapeake Bay.
    不详
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2005, 24 (02): : 677 - 677
  • [7] Gametogenesis of eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791), and Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in disease-endemic lower Chesapeake Bay
    Barber, BJ
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 1996, 15 (02): : 285 - 290
  • [8] GROWTH OF TRAY-CULTURED OYSTERS (CRASSOSTREA-VIRGINICA GMELIN) IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
    PAYNTER, KT
    DIMICHELE, L
    AQUACULTURE, 1990, 87 (3-4) : 289 - 297
  • [9] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISEASE IN CRASSOSTREA-VIRGINICA (GMELIN) AND THERMAL EFFLUENTS IN THE CHESAPEAKE-DELAWARE-BAY AREA
    TINSMAN, JC
    MAURER, D
    INTERNATIONALE REVUE DER GESAMTEN HYDROBIOLOGIE, 1986, 71 (04): : 495 - 509
  • [10] Resistance of dermo in eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin), of North Carolina but not Chesapeake Bay heritage
    Brown, BL
    Butt, AJ
    Shelton, SW
    Meritt, D
    Paynter, KT
    AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (14) : 1391 - 1399