Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Morphology

被引:44
|
作者
Rickard, John [1 ]
Bassiouny, Mohamed [1 ]
Cronin, Edmond M. [1 ]
Martin, David O. [1 ]
Varma, Niraj [1 ]
Niebauer, Mark J. [1 ]
Tchou, Patrick J. [1 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [1 ]
Wilkoff, Bruce L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Inst Heart & Vasc, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2011年 / 108卷 / 11期
关键词
HEART-FAILURE; MIRACLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphologies are thought to derive less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than those with LBBB. However, some patients do exhibit improvement. The characteristics associated with a response to CRT in patients with non-LBBB morphologies are unknown. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected from 850 consecutive patients presenting for a new CRT device. For inclusion, all patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <= 35%, a QRS duration of >= 120 ms, and baseline and follow-up echocardiograms available. Patients with a paced rhythm or LBBB were excluded. The response was defined as an absolute decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume of >= 10% from baseline. Multivariate models were constructed to identify variables significantly associated with the response and long-term outcomes. A total of 99 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these 99 patients, 22 had right bundle branch block and 77 had nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay; 52.5% met the criteria for response. On multivariate analysis, the QRS duration was the only variable significantly associated with the response (odds ratio per 10-ms increase 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.52, p = 0.048). During a mean follow-up of 5.4 +/- 0.9 years, 65 patients died or underwent heart transplant or left ventricular assist device placement. On multivariate analysis, the QRS duration was inversely associated with poor long-term outcomes (hazard ratio per 10-ms increase 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.94, p = 0.005). In patients with advanced heart failure and non-LBBB morphologies, a wider baseline QRS duration is an important determinant of enhanced reverse ventricular remodeling and improved long-term outcomes after CRT. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1576-1580)
引用
收藏
页码:1576 / 1580
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Morphologies
    Rickard, John
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
    Baranowski, Bryan
    Wazni, Oussama
    Martin, David O.
    Grimm, Richard
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (05): : 590 - 595
  • [2] Electrocardiogram in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Non-Left Bundle Branch Block an Oversimplification?
    Gold, Michael R.
    Koerber, Scott M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (24) : 3100 - 3101
  • [3] Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block
    Nakamura, Toshihiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Useda, Nobuhiko
    Oka, Satoshi
    Miyazaki, Yuichiro
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [4] Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Prolonged QRS Patterns?
    Belkin, Mark N.
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 19 (12)
  • [5] Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Prolonged QRS Patterns?
    Mark N. Belkin
    Gaurav A. Upadhyay
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2017, 19
  • [6] QRS Voltage in Precordial Leads Predicts Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Patients
    Apetrei, Csilla-Andrea
    Avram, Teodora
    Sarb, Adriana Daniela
    Zehan, Iulia
    Moldovan, Madalina
    Sorin, Pop
    Gusetu, Gabriel
    Mocanu, Lorena
    Coseriu, Giorgia
    Burde, Andrada
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [7] Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block
    Guo, Jincun
    Li, Linlin
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Ye, Tao
    Huang, Xinyi
    Meng, Fanqi
    Li, Qiang
    Chen, Simei
    Cai, Binni
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1460 - 1468
  • [8] Effect of PR interval prolongation on long-term outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block vs non-left bundle branch block morphologies undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Rickard, John
    Karim, Mohammad
    Baranowski, Bryan
    Cantillon, Daniel
    Spragg, David
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    Niebauer, Mark
    Grimm, Richard
    Trulock, Kevin
    Wilkoff, Bruce
    Varma, Niraj
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (10) : 1523 - 1528
  • [9] Free Wall Activation Delay is Predictive of Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Narrower QRS Width or Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Morphology
    Marek, Josef J.
    Ahmed, Mohamed
    Ryo, Keiko
    Haugaa, Kristina H.
    Saba, Samir
    Gorcsan, John
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [10] Optimal Lead Placement Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Patients Still Looking for a Better Understanding!
    Galand, Vincent
    Daubert, Jean-Claude
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (09) : 1182 - 1184