CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses

被引:8
作者
Götze, C
Vieth, V
Meier, N
Böttner, F
Steinbeck, J
Hackenberg, L
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Orthoped, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-4400 Munster, Germany
关键词
total hip replacement; custom-made femoral stem; endosteal bone contact; CT-based measurement;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.015
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background. To optimize physiological load transfer and mechanical stability a close geometric fit between cementless stems and the bone stock is essential. To solve the problem of a geometric mismatch between the anatomic shape of the femoral canal and conventional stems custom-made implants were developed. This study determined the accuracy of implanting custom-made press-fit straight femoral stems compared to conventional cementless stems. Methods. Nine pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used to determine the extent of the endocortical area in contact with the stem. The bone-femoral component interface was measured in vitro using CT-data analysis. A software program was developed to describe the periprosthetic inner cortical bone structure, the stem surface and the proportionate implant-endosteal bone contact. Findings. The mean endosteal bone contact of both prostheses was 21.6%. The proportionate implant-endosteal bone contact for straight custom-made femoral prostheses averaged 20.98%. For the conventional cementless stems the mean proportionate contact was 22.15%. Especially in the proximal femur the desirable contact of customized implants was not achieved by closed distal press-fit. Interpretation. Compared to conventional straight cementless stems custom-made stems did not extend the endocortical contact area. The desirable "fit and fill" of the proximal femur was not achieved with straight custom-made femoral components in femurs of regular geometry. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 862
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   COMPUTER-ASSISTED PRODUCTION OF INDIVIDUAL TOTAL PROSTHESES [J].
ALDINGER, G ;
FISCHER, A ;
KURTZ, B .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1984, 122 (05) :733-736
[2]  
BARGAR WL, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V249, P73
[3]  
BARGAR WL, 1992, J BONE JOINT SUR B S, V74, P172
[4]  
Breusch SJ, 2000, UNFALLCHIRURG, V103, P918, DOI 10.1007/s001130050647
[5]  
CAPELLO WN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V249, P56
[6]  
Dujardin FH, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P276
[7]  
Engh C.A., 1985, BIOL FIXATION TOTAL
[8]  
Fruhwald F, 1988, Rontgenblatter, V41, P313
[9]   Primary stability in cementless femoral stems:: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis [J].
Götze, C ;
Steens, W ;
Vieth, V ;
Poremba, C ;
Claes, L ;
Steinbeck, J .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (04) :267-273
[10]   SUB-PERIOSTEAL EXPANSION AND CORTICAL REMODELING OF THE HUMAN FEMUR AND TIBIA WITH AGING [J].
HAYES, WC .
SCIENCE, 1982, 217 (4563) :945-948