Cement Augmentation of Refractory Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Survivorship Analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Gerling, Michael C. [1 ]
Eubanks, Jason D. [2 ]
Patel, Rakesh [3 ]
Whang, Peter G. [4 ]
Bohlman, Henry H. [2 ]
Ahn, Nicholas U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lutheran Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Spine Div, Brooklyn, NY 11220 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Orthoped, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
cementation; kyphoplasty; survival; vertebral compression fracture; vertebroplasty; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BALLOON KYPHOPLASTY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; VERTEBROPLASTY; WOMEN; PAIN; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820a0b3f
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. To compare survivorship after cement augmentation of refractory osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with traditional inpatient pain management and bracing. Summary of Background Data. OVCFs can cause debilitating pain and functional decline necessitating prolonged bed rest and high-dose narcotics. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are cement augmentation procedures used to control pain and restore function in patients with OVCF's that are refractory to conservative treatment. Early mobilization is associated with improved survival after other fractures in elderly patients. Methods. A university hospital database was used to identify all participants treated with primary diagnosis of OVCF between 1993 and 2006. Chart review and imaging studies were used to confirm demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis, and treatment. Survival time was determined using hospital data, national death indices and patient follow-up. Exact Fisher tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and proportional hazards regression models with Kaplan-Meier plots compared patients treated with cement augmentation with controls treated with inpatient pain management and bracing. Patients with high-energy trauma, tumors or age more than 60 years were excluded. Results. Within the past 12 years, 46 patients treated with cement augmentation and 129 matched controls met inclusion criteria. They did not differ with respect to age, sex, and comorbidities. A significant survival advantage was found after cement augmentation compared with controls (P < 0.001; log rank), regardless of comorbidities, age, or the number of fractures diagnosed at the start date (P = 0.565). Controlling simultaneously for covariates, the estimated hazard ratio associated with cementation was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.43; P = 0.002) for year 1, 0.15 (95% CI = 0.02-1.12; P = 0.064) for year 2, and 0.95 (95% CI = 0.32-2.79; P = 0.919) for subsequent follow-up. The number of OVCFs at the start time of treatment did not affect survival benefit of cementation (P = 0.44). Conclusion. Cement augmentation of refractory OVCF improves survival for up to 2 years when compared with conservative pain management with bed rest, narcotics, and extension bracing, regardless of age, sex, and number of fractures or comorbidities. Therefore, aggressive management should be considered for refractory OVCFs with intractable back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:E1266 / E1269
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures
    Sebaaly, Amer
    Rizkallah, Maroun
    Bachour, Falah
    Atallah, Firas
    Moreau, Pierre Emmanuel
    Maalouf, Ghassan
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (06): : 293 - 299
  • [2] Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures What is the Current Evidence Pro and Con?
    Gozel, Tarik
    Ortiz, A. Orlando
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (06) : 979 - 991
  • [3] Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures
    Richmond, Bradford J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2016, 19 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [4] Cement augmentation for osteoporotic compression fractures
    Lee, M. J.
    Jarvik, J. G.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2012, 115 (12): : 1066 - 1069
  • [5] Cement augmentation for osteoporotic compression fractures
    Lee, M. J.
    Jarvik, J. G.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2012, 115 (12): : 1066 - 1069
  • [6] Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures will increase the number of subsequent fractures at adjacent vertebral levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, H-B
    Shan, J-L
    Tang, H.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (16) : 5176 - 5188
  • [7] Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation
    Mao, Haiqing
    Zou, Jun
    Geng, Dechun
    Zhu, Xuesong
    Zhu, Mo
    Jiang, Weimin
    Yang, Huilin
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 54 (10) : 1137 - 1143
  • [8] Clinical and radiological subsequent fractures after vertebral augmentation for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Hai-Bo
    Jing, Xiao-Shan
    Tang, Hai
    Hai, Yong
    Li, Jin-Jun
    Shan, Jian-Lin
    Wang, De-Cheng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (10) : 2576 - 2590
  • [9] Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Analysis of Risk Factors
    Xie, Weixing
    Jin, Daxiang
    Ma, Hui
    Ding, Jinyong
    Xu, Jixi
    Zhang, Shuncong
    Liang, De
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (04): : E171 - E176
  • [10] Treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous cement augmentation
    Saracen, Agnieszka
    Kotwica, Zbigniew
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (11) : 2309 - 2312