Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach

被引:102
作者
Deng, Yong [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [2 ]
Jiang, Wen [3 ]
Tesfamariam, Solomon [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[2] Univ British Columbia, Okanagan Sch Engn, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Elect & Informat, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk analysis; Complex systems; Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence; Fuzzy set theory; Similarity measure; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; WATER-QUALITY FAILURES; COMBINING BELIEF FUNCTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; SIMILARITY MEASURES; UNCERTAINTY; NUMBERS; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Performing risk analysis can be a challenging task for complex systems due to lack of data and insufficient understanding of the failure mechanisms. A semi quantitative approach that can utilize imprecise information, uncertain data and domain experts' knowledge can be an effective way to perform risk analysis for complex systems. Though the definition of risk varies considerably across disciplines, it is a well accepted notion to use a composition of likelihood of system failure and the associated consequences (severity of loss). A complex system consists of various components, where these two elements of risk for each component can be linguistically described by the domain experts. The proposed linguistic approach is based on fuzzy set theory and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, where the later has been used to combine the risk of components to determine the system risk. The proposed risk analysis approach is demonstrated through a numerical example. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15438 / 15446
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]   Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment [J].
Lee, HS .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 132 (03) :303-315
[32]  
Lefevre E., 2002, Information Fusion, V3, P149, DOI 10.1016/S1566-2535(02)00053-2
[33]  
Li DF, 2002, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V23, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8655(01)00110-6
[34]   Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J].
Liang, ZZ ;
Shi, PF .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2003, 24 (15) :2687-2693
[35]  
Markowitz H. M., 1991, PORTFOLIO SELECTION
[36]   Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts [J].
Murphy, CK .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2000, 29 (01) :1-9
[37]   A subjective methodology for risk quantification based on generalized fuzzy numbers [J].
Qi, Liu ;
Jia, Xiong ;
Yong, Deng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 37 (02) :149-165
[38]  
Roy AD, 1952, ECONOMETRICA, V20, pA431
[39]   Predicting risk of water quality failures in distribution networks under uncertainties using fault-tree analysis [J].
Sadiq, R. ;
Saint-Martin, E. ;
Kleiner, Y. .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2008, 5 (04) :287-304
[40]   Water quality failures in distribution networks - Risk analysis using fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning [J].
Sadiq, Rehan ;
Kleiner, Yehuda ;
Rajani, Balvant .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (05) :1381-1394