The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management: something for everyone

被引:12
作者
Valikangas, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Social Sci, Pract Philosophy, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Grand challenges; research policy; science funding; university management; boundary objects; articulation work; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; SCIENCE; MISSION; SUSTAINABILITY; STAKEHOLDERS; TECHNOLOGY; LEGITIMACY; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1080/23299460.2022.2040870
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The notion of grand challenges has become popular in research governance to support the allocation of research funding to societally beneficial topics. This article illustrates the flexibility and usefulness of grand challenges for university rectorates and project leaders when communicating with policy makers, research hinders, and local industries and companies. The Flexibility is beneficial to researchers and rectorate during the design stage of research projects. However, their utility diminishes in the later stages as other targets take precedence, particularly the need to demonstrate academic excellence. First, I explore the definitions of grand challenges in United States and European Union. Second, I provide a case study demonstrating the use of grand challenges in one technical research university. Last, I propose that if the aim in research policy is to orient research more towards societal benefit, more specific processual or outcome-oriented targets should be introduced to supplement grand challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 113
页数:21
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Limits of decentered governance in science-society policies
    Am, Heidrun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2019, 6 (02) : 163 - 178
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, The European Commission consults on how the European audit market can be improved
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, A Strategy for American Innovation
  • [4] Bowker Geoffrey, 1999, SORTING THINGS OUT
  • [5] What do mission statements reveal about the values of top universities in the world?
    Breznik, Kristijan
    Law, Kris M. Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 27 (05) : 1362 - 1375
  • [6] What's special about basic research?
    Calvert, J
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2006, 31 (02) : 199 - 220
  • [7] European Action Plans for Science-Society Relations: Changing Buzzwords, Changing the Agenda
    Conceicao, Cristina Palma
    Avila, Patricia
    Coelho, Ana Rita
    Costa, Antonio Firmino
    [J]. MINERVA, 2020, 58 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [8] CORDIS, 2009, SWED PRES RES MUST F
  • [9] RRI: implementation as learning
    Egeland, Cathrine
    Forsberg, Ellen-Marie
    Maximova-Mentzoni, Tatiana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2019, 6 (03) : 375 - 380
  • [10] European Commission, 2016, FAQ SHOULD INT STAK