Exploring Why Financial Incentives Fail to Affect At-home Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Mixed Methods Study

被引:1
作者
Clifton, Alicia B. W. [1 ]
Mehta, Shivan J. [3 ]
Wainwright, Jocelyn, V [2 ]
Ogden, Shannon N. [4 ]
Saia, Chelsea A. [2 ]
Rendle, Katharine A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Penn Ctr Canc Care Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, 51 N 39th St,PPMC Mutch Bldg,Floor 7, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Financial incentives; Mixed methods research; Population health; Primary care; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-021-07228-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Despite success in increasing other health behaviors, financial incentives have shown limited to no effect on colorectal cancer (CRC screening. Little is known about the factors shaping why and for whom incentives improve screening. OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspective of participants enrolled in a larger, four-arm pragmatic trial at urban family medicine practices which assessed and failed to detect significant effects of financial incentives on at-home CRC screening completion. DESIGN: We performed a mixed methods study with a subset of randomly selected patients, stratified by study arm, following completion of the pragmatic trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (46.9% enrollment rate) who were eligible and overdue for colorectal cancer screening at the time of trial enrollment and who continued to receive care at family medicine practices affiliated with an urban academic health system completed the interview and questionnaire. MAIN MEASURES: Using Andersen's behavioral model, a semi-structured interview guide assessed motivators, barriers, and facilitators to screening completion and the impact of incentives on decision-making. Participants also completed a brief questionnaire evaluating demographics, screening beliefs, and clinical characteristics. KEY RESULTS: The majority of patients (n = 49; 82%) reported that incentives would not change their decision to complete or not complete CRC screening, which was confirmed by qualitative data as largely due to high perceived health benefits. Those who stated financial incentives would impact their decision (n = 11) were significantly less likely to agree that CRC screening is beneficial (72.7% vs 95.9%; p < 0.05) or that CRC could be cured if detected early (63.6% vs 98.0%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives are likely not an effective behavioral intervention to increase CRC screening for all but may be powerful for increasing short-term benefit and therefore completion for some. Targeting financial incentive interventions according to patient screening beliefs may prove a cost-effective strategy in primary care outreach programs to increase CRC screening.
引用
收藏
页码:2751 / 2758
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] REVISITING THE BEHAVIORAL-MODEL AND ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE - DOES IT MATTER
    ANDERSEN, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, BEH RISK FACT SURV S
  • [3] Bakhai Smita, 2018, BMJ Open Qual, V7, pe000400, DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000400
  • [4] Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers
    Cahill, Sean
    Singal, Robbie
    Grasso, Chris
    King, Dana
    Mayer, Kenneth
    Baker, Kellan
    Makadon, Harvey
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2020, COL CANC SCREEN RAT
  • [6] Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Schneider, Jennifer L.
    Sanchez, Jennifer J.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Green, Beverly
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 5 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [7] Creswell J. W., 2018, RES DESIGN QUALITATI
  • [8] Creswell JW., 2018, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, V3
  • [9] Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Quinn, Virginia P.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Goodman, Michael
    Johnson, Jill R.
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Becerra, Tracy A.
    Zhao, Wei K.
    Schottinger, Joanne
    Doria-Rose, V. Paul
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Weiss, Noel S.
    Fletcher, Robert H.
    [J]. GUT, 2018, 67 (02) : 291 - U253
  • [10] Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dougherty, Michael K.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Crockett, Seth D.
    Gupta, Shivani
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Coker-Schwimmer, Manny
    Cubillos, Laura
    Malo, Teri
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (12) : 1645 - 1658