MRI quality assurance based on 3D FLAIR brain images

被引:5
|
作者
Peltonen, Juha I. [1 ,2 ]
Makela, Teemu [1 ,3 ]
Salli, Eero [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS Med Imaging Ctr, Radiol, POB 340, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Neurosci & Biomed Engn, POB 12200, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, POB 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Quality assurance; Quality control; Computer-assisted image analysis; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; SEQUENCES; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY; PREVALENCE; CONTRAST;
D O I
10.1007/s10334-018-0699-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveQuality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often relies on imaging phantoms with suitable structures and uniform regions. However, the connection between phantom measurements and actual clinical image quality is ambiguous. Thus, it is desirable to measure objective image quality directly from clinical images.Materials and methodsIn this work, four measurements suitable for clinical image QA were presented: image resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio, quality index and bias index. The methods were applied to a large cohort of clinical 3D FLAIR volumes over a test period of 9.5 months. The results were compared with phantom QA. Additionally, the effect of patient movement on the presented measures was studied.ResultsA connection between the presented clinical QA methods and scanner performance was observed: the values reacted to MRI equipment breakdowns that occurred during the study period. No apparent correlation with phantom QA results was found. The patient movement was found to have a significant effect on the resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio values.DiscussionQA based on clinical images provides a direct method for following MRI scanner performance. The methods could be used to detect problems, and potentially reduce scanner downtime. Furthermore, with the presented methodologies comparisons could be made between different sequences and imaging settings. In the future, an online QA system could recognize insufficient image quality and suggest an immediate re-scan.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 699
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ELASTICALLY DEFORMING 3D ATLAS TO MATCH ANATOMICAL BRAIN IMAGES
    GEE, JC
    REIVICH, M
    BAJCSY, R
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1993, 17 (02) : 225 - 236
  • [42] 3D SURFACE RENDERED MR IMAGES OF THE BRAIN AND ITS VASCULATURE
    CLINE, HE
    LORENSEN, WE
    SOUZA, SP
    JOLESZ, FA
    KIKINIS, R
    GERIG, G
    KENNEDY, TE
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (02) : 344 - 351
  • [43] Feasibility of 3D quality assurance system with electrode array for electric fields therapy
    Hong, Jinyoung
    Jo, Yunhui
    Gi, Yongha
    Oh, Geon
    Lim, Hyeongjin
    Ko, Yousun
    Ahn, Sung Hwan
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2025, : 806 - 818
  • [44] A robust, autonomous, volumetric quality assurance method for 3D printed porous scaffolds
    Zhang, Nicholas
    Singh, Srujan
    Liu, Stephen
    Zbijewski, Wojciech
    Grayson, Warren L.
    3D PRINTING IN MEDICINE, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [45] Quality assurance: Fundamental reproducibility tests for 3D treatment-planning systems
    Able, Charles M.
    Thomas, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 6 (03): : 13 - 22
  • [46] Comparison of SLOT and μ-CT investigation of 3D printed polymer parts for quality assurance
    Hohenhoff, Gerrit
    Meyer, Heiko
    Jaeschke, Peter
    Ripken, Tammo
    Kracht, Dietmar
    Kaierle, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF LASER APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (02)
  • [47] 3D MRI in Osteoarthritis
    Oei, Edwin H. G.
    van Zadelhoff, Tijmen A.
    Eijgenraam, Susanne M.
    Klein, Stefan
    Hirvasniemi, Jukka
    van der Heijden, Rianne A.
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 25 (03) : 468 - 479
  • [48] 3D MRI of the Spine
    Sahr, Meghan
    Tan, Ek Tsoon
    Sneag, Darryl B.
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 25 (03) : 433 - 440
  • [49] A robust, autonomous, volumetric quality assurance method for 3D printed porous scaffolds
    Nicholas Zhang
    Srujan Singh
    Stephen Liu
    Wojciech Zbijewski
    Warren L. Grayson
    3D Printing in Medicine, 8
  • [50] 3D Polymer Gel Dosimeters with iCBCT 3D Reading and polyGeVero-CT Software Package for Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy
    Kozicki, Marek
    Maras, Piotr
    Jaszczak-Kuligowska, Malwina
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (06)