Identifiers suggestive of clinical cervical spine instability:: A Delphi study of physical therapists

被引:42
作者
Cook, C [1 ]
Brismée, JM
Fleming, R
Sizer, PS
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Lubbock, TX USA
[3] Ellis Hosp, Schenectady, NY USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2005年 / 85卷 / 09期
关键词
cervical spine; clinical instability; consensus; Delphi method;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/85.9.895
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Clinical cervical spine instability (CCSI) is controversal and difficult to diagnose. Within the literature, no clinical or diagnostic tests that yield valid and reliable results have been described to differentially diagnose this condition. The purpose of this study was to attempt to obtain consensus on symptoms and physical examination findings that are associated with CCSI. Subjects. One hundred seventy-two physical therapists who were Orthopaedic Certified Specialists (OCS) or Fellows of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (FAAOMPT) participated in the survey. Methods. This study was a 3-round Delphi survey designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for CCSI. Results. The symptoms that reached the highest consensus among respondents were "intolerance to prolonged static postures," "fatigue and inability to hold head up," "better with external support, including hands or collar," "frequent need for self-manipulation," "feeling of instability, shaking, or lack of control," "frequent episodes of acute attacks," and "sharp pain, possibly with sudden movements." The physical examination findings related to cervical instability that reached the highest consensus among respondents included "poor coordination/neuromuscular control, including poor recruitment and dissociation of cervical segments with movement," "abnormal joint play," "motion that is not smooth throughout range (of motion), including segmental hinging, pivoting, or fulcruming," and "aberrant movement." Discussion and Conclusion. The Delphi method is useful in situations where clinical judgments are encountered but empirical evidence to provide evidence-based decision making does not exist. Findings of this study may provide beneficial clinical information, specifically when the identifiers are clustered together, because no set of clinical examination and symptom standards for CCSI currently exists. Diagnosis of CCSI is challenging; therefore, appropriate clinical reasoning is required for distinctive physical therapy assessment using pertinent symptoms and physical examination findings.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 906
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Adler M., 1996, Gazing into the oracle
[2]  
ALTMAN RD, 1987, SCAND J RHEUMATOL, P31
[3]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR OCCUPATIONAL T
[4]  
ASPINALL W, 1990, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, V12, P47
[5]   CONSENSUS DIAGNOSES AND GOLD STANDARDS - COMMENTARY [J].
BEGG, CB ;
METZ, CE .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :29-30
[6]   The distribution of survey contact and participation in the United States: Constructing a survey-based estimate [J].
Bickart, B ;
Schmittlein, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (02) :286-294
[7]  
BINKLEY J, 1993, PHYS THER, V73, P138, DOI 10.1093/ptj/73.3.138
[8]  
BODEN S, 1997, ADULT SPINE, P1209
[9]  
Bradley N, 1999, J MARKET RES SOC, V41, P387
[10]   A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain [J].
Bronfort, G ;
Evans, R ;
Nelson, B ;
Aker, PD ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Vernon, H .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (07) :788-797