Defining and classifying personal and household climate change adaptation behaviors

被引:66
作者
Carman, Jennifer P. [1 ]
Zint, Michaela T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Sustainabil & Environm, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Literature Sci & Arts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2020年 / 61卷
关键词
Climate change; Adaptation; Behavior; Systematic review; Interdisciplinary; Personal and household actions; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF MODEL; PROTECTION MOTIVATION; PUBLIC SUPPORT; FEAR APPEALS; RESILIENCE; STRATEGIES; VULNERABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With climate change increasingly affecting individuals' day-to-day lives, interest is growing in the personal and household adaptation behaviors that people can engage in. Many of these behaviors focus on actions to protect oneself or one's household in response to immediate hazards rather than ones that may achieve longer-term adaptation goals. We conducted a content analysis of 75 publications identified through a systematic literature review to learn how researchers from a range of disciplines conceptualize adaptive behavior in the context of climate change and what kinds of specific actions they describe. Based on this review, we propose a comprehensive definition of personal and household adaptation behavior that considers its purpose (i.e., preventing harm or gaining benefits), timing (i.e., proactive or reactive), time scale (i.e., short-term or long-term), as well as who acts (i.e., the individual alone or with others) and who is affected by those actions (i.e., the individual, other people, or the environment). We classify specific individual adaptation behaviors into civic engagement, consumption, coping, household protection, learning, lifestyle changes, migration, and self-protection. Research is needed to better understand the personal and societal benefits of adaptation behaviors and how to more equitably support these actions in different contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
[81]   The paradox of social resilience: How cognitive strategies and coping mechanisms attenuate and accentuate resilience [J].
Shaw, Duncan ;
Scully, Judy ;
Hart, Tom .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 25 :194-203
[82]   Should We Leave? Attitudes towards Relocation in Response to Sea Level Rise [J].
Song, Jie ;
Peng, Binbin .
WATER, 2017, 9 (12)
[83]   Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda [J].
Steg, Linda ;
Vlek, Charles .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 29 (03) :309-317
[84]   Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior [J].
Stern, PC .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) :407-424
[85]   PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE [J].
STERN, PC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 43 :269-302
[86]  
Stewart Alan E., 2009, V1, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8921-3_10
[87]   Coastal dwellers-power against climate change: a place-based perspective on individual and collective engagement in North Frisia [J].
Suesser, Diana .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 22 (01) :169-182
[88]   Psychology's Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change [J].
Swim, Janet K. ;
Stern, Paul C. ;
Doherty, Thomas J. ;
Clayton, Susan ;
Reser, Joseph P. ;
Weber, Elke U. ;
Gifford, Robert ;
Howard, George S. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 66 (04) :241-250
[89]   The Role of Collective Efficacy in Climate Change Adaptation in India [J].
Thaker, Jagadish ;
Maibach, Edward ;
Leiserowitz, Anthony ;
Zhao, Xiaoquan ;
Howe, Peter .
WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2016, 8 (01) :21-34
[90]   Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework [J].
Truelove, Heather Barnes ;
Carrico, Amanda R. ;
Weber, Elke U. ;
Raimi, Kaitlin Toner ;
Vandenbergh, Michael P. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 29 :127-138