Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Recipients Experiencing Gastrointestinal Intolerance: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study

被引:44
作者
Langone, Anthony J. [1 ]
Chan, Laurence [2 ]
Bolin, Paul [3 ]
Cooper, Matthew [4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Div Nephrol, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Nephrol, Denver, CO USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Gastrointestinal; Quality of life; HRQoL; Mycophenolate mofetil; Mycophenolate sodium; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ACUTE REJECTION; HEALTH-STATUS; COMPLICATIONS; RELIABILITY; CONVERSION; REDUCTION; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e318205568c
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Two open-label studies demonstrated that conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) significantly reduces gastrointestinal (GI) symptom burden and improves GI-specific health-related quality of life. Using a randomized design, this study evaluated changes in GI symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients converted from MMF to EC-MPS versus patients who continued with MMF-based treatment. Methods. In this 4-week, multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group trial, renal transplant recipients with GI symptoms receiving MMF plus a calcineurin inhibitor +/- corticosteroids were randomized to an equimolar dose of EC-MPS+MMF placebo or continue on their MMF-based regimen+EC-MPS placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was a change from baseline in total Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score of a minimally important difference of more than or equal to 0.3. Results. Three hundred ninety-six patients (EC-MPS group: n=199; MMF group: n=197) were included. A greater proportion of EC-MPS patients (62%) reached the primary efficacy outcome compared with MMF patients (55%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.15). EC-MPS patients had a significantly greater decrease in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale indigestion syndrome dimension versus MMF patients. Within the subgroups of patients with diabetes, patients transplanted 6 to 12 months of study enrollment, and patients on steroids, a statistically significant greater proportion of EC-MPS versus MMF patients reached the primary efficacy outcome. Conclusions. Conversion fromMMFto EC-MPS may be associated with improvements in presence and severity of GI symptoms, particularly in patients with indigestion, diabetes, on steroids, and in patients converted between 6 and 12 months posttransplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 478
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium immunosuppression in renal transplant patients: efficacy and dosing [J].
Cooper, Matthew ;
Salvadori, Maurizio ;
Budde, Klemens ;
Oppenheimer, Frederic ;
Sollinger, Hans ;
Zeier, Martin .
TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS, 2012, 26 (04) :233-240
[32]   Improvement in 3-month patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients [J].
Bolin, Paul ;
Tanriover, Bekir ;
Zibari, Gazi B. ;
Lynn, Melissa L. ;
Pirsch, John D. ;
Chan, Laurence ;
Cooper, Matthew ;
Langone, Anthony J. ;
Tomlanovich, Stephen J. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (11) :1443-1451
[33]   Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium: A Large, Single-Center Comparison of Dose Adjustments and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients [J].
Sollinger, Hans W. ;
Sundberg, Aimee K. ;
Leverson, Glen ;
Voss, Barbara J. ;
Pirsch, John D. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (04) :446-451
[34]   Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation [J].
Langone, Anthony ;
Shihab, Fuad ;
Pankewycz, Oleh ;
Doria, Cataldo ;
Wiland, Anne ;
McCague, Kevin ;
Chan, Laurence .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (09) :961-967
[35]   Comparison of the exposure of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation [J].
Belliere, Julie ;
Esposito, Laure ;
Gandia, Peggy ;
Duffas, Jean Pierre ;
Sallusto, Federico ;
Cardeau-Desangles, Isabelle ;
Del Bello, Arnaud ;
Rostaing, Lionel ;
Kamar, Nassim .
ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19 :76-81
[36]   Successful Conversion From Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (Myfortic) in Liver Transplant Patients With Gastrointestinal Side Effects [J].
Robaeys, G. ;
Cassiman, D. ;
Verslype, C. ;
Monbaliu, D. ;
Aerts, R. ;
Pirenne, J. ;
Nevens, F. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (02) :610-613
[37]   The Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Its Gastrointestinal Side Effects in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients of Hispanic Ethnicity [J].
Shah, Tariq ;
Tellez-Corrales, Eglis ;
Yang, Jae-Wook ;
Qazi, Yasir ;
Wang, Jeffrey ;
Wilson, James ;
Hutchinson, Ian ;
Min, David I. .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2011, 33 (01) :45-49
[38]   Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance kidney-pancreas transplant recipients [J].
Ricart, Maria J. ;
Oppenheimer, Frederic ;
Andres, Amado ;
Morales, Jose M. ;
Alonso, Angel ;
Fernandez, Constantino .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 26 (03) :424-431
[39]   Long-term safety and efficacy after conversion of maintenance renal transplant recipients from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPA, myfortic®) [J].
Budde, K. ;
Knoll, G. ;
Curtis, J. ;
Chan, L. ;
Pohanka, E. ;
Gentil, M. ;
Seifu, Y. ;
Marrast, A. -C. ;
Neumayer, H. -H. .
CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 66 (02) :103-111
[40]   Pharmacokinetics and variability of mycophenolic acid from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium compared with mycophenolate mofetil in de novo heart transplant recipients [J].
Hummel, Manfred ;
Yonan, Nizar ;
Ross, Heather ;
Miller, Leslie W. ;
Sechaud, Romain ;
Balez, Sebastien ;
Koelle, Ernst Ulrich ;
Gerosa, Gino .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 21 (01) :18-23