Mechanism of Citizen Evaluation of Policy Using Machine Self-Learning

被引:1
作者
Tsyganov, Vladimir V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Control Sci, Moscow 117997, Russia
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2021年 / 54卷 / 13期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; control & political stability; COVID-19; human factor; machine learning; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.428
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Public policy is designed to influence society. In turn, members of society - citizens should evaluate this policy so that society can control it. According to the concept of digital society, policy evaluation is based on artificial intelligence solutions, primarily machine learning. In addition, when monitoring politics by society, it is necessary to take into account the human factor. The article discusses theoretical and practical issues that arise when a citizen applies the machine learning procedure to determine alternative evaluations - ratings of a politician. In conditions of uncertainty, it is assumed that this politician knows his ability to meet the needs of society better than the citizen. Using this knowledge, the politician can manipulate own activities in order to get higher ratings today and in the future. Such undesirable activity can lead to the failure to use the available opportunities in which the citizen and society as a whole are interested. To solve this problem in conditions of uncertainty, a mechanism for citizen evaluation of politician is proposed. This mechanism includes the procedure of machine learning of dichotomy and the formation of alternative ratings of a politician. Sufficient conditions have been found for the synthesis of such a mechanism in which a politician fully uses the existing opportunities in the interests of the citizen and society as a whole. The functioning of this mechanism is illustrated by the example of an evaluation of the national policy on vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK. Such a mechanism encourages the politician to use all available opportunities in the public interest. The developed mechanism can be used by any citizen for permanent evaluation of policy using machine selflearning. For this, for example, such mechanism can be implemented as an application on a smart phone. Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: A multidisciplinary approach
    Ahuja, Abhimanyu S.
    Reddy, Vineet Pasam
    Marques, Oge
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03)
  • [2] Asymmetric awareness and moral hazard
    Auster, Sarah
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2013, 82 : 503 - 521
  • [3] Leaders without ethics in global business: corporate psychopaths
    Boddy, Clive R. P.
    Ladyshewsky, Richard
    Galvin, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2010, 10 (03) : 121 - 138
  • [4] Burkov V., 2013, MECH DESIGN MANAGEME
  • [5] Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability?
    de Laat P.B.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2018, 31 (4) : 525 - 541
  • [6] Minding morality: ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling
    Diallo, Saikou Y.
    Shults, F. LeRon
    Wildman, Wesley J.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2021, 36 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [7] EC, 2021, CREAT DIG SOC
  • [8] Gill K. S., 2020, SOC, V35, P3
  • [9] AI&Society: editorial volume 35.2: the trappings of AI Agency
    Gill, Karamjit S.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [10] Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy
    Licht, Karl de Fine
    Licht, Jenny de Fine
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (04) : 917 - 926