The Mayo Clinic manuscript series relative to the discussion, dissemination, and operationalization of the food and drug administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes

被引:37
作者
Sloan, Jeff A. [1 ]
Halyard, Michele Y.
Frost, Marlene H.
Dueck, Amylou C.
Teschendorf, Bonnie
Rothman, Margaret L.
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Womens Canc Program, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Amer Canc Soc, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[5] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut, Raritan, NJ USA
关键词
FDA guidance; patient-reported outcomes; QOL; quality of life;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00267.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become increasingly prevalent in clinical research and practice. On February 2, 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance document with respect to incorporating PROs into clinical research endeavors which include FDA involvement. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic worked with FDA personnel and experts from academia, industry, clinical research, and clinical practice to facilitate discussion, dissemination, and operationalization of the FDA guidance document. This article introduces a manuscript series that resulted from this collective effort. Basic terms are definedand a precis of each article in the manuscript series is given. The ultimate conclusion to be drawn from this series is that, while the goals of assessing and analyzing PRO elements of clinical practice and research are challenging, there now exists a scientific foundation that makes achieving these goals feasible and the results credible. This is vitally important because after all, at the heart of all healthcare endeavors is the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:S59 / S63
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001
    Acquadro, C
    Berzon, R
    Dubois, D
    Leidy, NK
    Marquis, P
    Revicki, D
    Rothman, M
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) : 522 - 531
  • [2] [Anonymous], CANC PAT CANC SURV L
  • [3] Denouement: A patient-reported observation
    Chauhan, Cynthia
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S146 - S147
  • [4] *FDA, 2006, GUID IND PAT REP OUT
  • [5] What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?
    Frost, Marlene H.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Liepa, Astra M.
    Stauffer, Joseph W.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S94 - S105
  • [6] Frost MH, 2002, MAYO CLIN PROC, V77, P488
  • [7] Guyatt GH, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P175
  • [8] The talking touchscreen: A new approach to outcomes assessment in low literacy
    Hahn, EA
    Cella, D
    Dobrez, D
    Shiomoto, G
    Marcus, E
    Taylor, SG
    Vohra, M
    Chang, CH
    Wright, BD
    Linacre, JM
    Weiss, BD
    Valenzuela, V
    Chiang, HL
    Webster, K
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (02) : 86 - 95
  • [9] Lipscomb J., 2005, Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications
  • [10] Evaluating health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group experience
    Osoba, David
    Bezjak, Andrea
    Brundage, Michael
    Pater, Joseph
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S138 - S145