Modeling the effect of rate and geometry on peeling and tack of pressure-sensitive adhesives

被引:35
作者
Mohammed, I. K. [1 ]
Charalambides, M. N. [1 ]
Kinloch, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Mech Engn, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Pressure-sensitive adhesive; Peeling; Finite element; Viscoelastic; Cohesive zones; Tack; COHESIVE ZONE MODEL; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; FRACTURE; ISSUE; PAPER; TAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.01.016
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A model is developed for predicting separation along interfaces of pressure sensitive adhesives. Many authors have used the cohesive zone approach to solve such problems but the parameter calibration of such models remains uncertain. This study reports a novel method for determining such parameters. In addition, it provides crucial evidence for the suitability of the cohesive zone model approach in modelling interface fractures. Peel tests were performed at various rates using specimens which consisted of a polyester backing membrane supporting an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) adhered to a polyethylene substrate. Interfacial separation of the PSA from the polyethylene substrate was observed. Finite element (FE) peeling simulations were conducted which modeled the backing-membrane as an elasto-plastic power-law material, the adhesive as a viscoelastic material and the interfacial properties with a cohesive zone model (CZM). The material properties of the backing membrane and the pressure-sensitive adhesive were measured from tensile and stress relaxation experiments. The rate-dependent CZM parameters were measured directly from poker-chip probe-tack tests which were performed at pull-off speeds which corresponded to the rates employed for the peel tests. The effect of the PSA thickness and test rate on both tack and peel was investigated experimentally, as well as modeled numerically. Good agreement was found between the experimentally measured and numerically predicted peel forces for different peel angles, speeds and PSA thicknesses. In addition, it was proven that the rate dependence observed in the peel and probe-tack data was dominated by the rate dependence of the interface properties, i.e. the time dependence of the two CZM parameters of maximum stress and fracture energy, rather than the time dependent bulk viscoelasticity of the PSA peel arm. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]  
Duncan B, 1999, MEASUREMENT GOOD PRA
[12]   Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test [J].
Georgiou, I ;
Hadavinia, H ;
Ivankovic, A ;
Kinloch, AJ ;
Tropsa, V ;
Williams, JG .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2003, 79 (03) :239-265
[13]   Determination of the constitutive constants of non-linear viscoelastic materials [J].
Goh, SM ;
Charalambides, MN ;
Williams, JG .
MECHANICS OF TIME-DEPENDENT MATERIALS, 2004, 8 (03) :255-268
[14]   A numerical analysis of the elastic-plastic peel test [J].
Hadavinia, H. ;
Kawashita, L. ;
Kinloch, A. J. ;
Moore, D. R. ;
Williams, J. G. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2006, 73 (16) :2324-2335
[15]   THIN-FILM PEELING - ELASTIC TERM [J].
KENDALL, K .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1975, 8 (13) :1449-1452
[16]   THE PEELING OF FLEXIBLE LAMINATES [J].
KINLOCH, AJ ;
LAU, CC ;
WILLIAMS, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1994, 66 (01) :45-70
[17]   The effects of substrate surface properties on tack performance of acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives (PSAs) [J].
Kowalski, Arkadiusz ;
Czech, Zbigniew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2015, 60 :9-15
[18]   How does the surface free energy influence the tack of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs)? [J].
Kowalski, Arkadiusz ;
Czech, Zbigniew ;
Byczynski, Lukasz .
JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH, 2013, 10 (06) :879-885
[19]  
Lende L.K., 2012, INT J PHARM RES DEV, V4, P96
[20]   Numerical analysis of the energy contributions in peel tests: A steady-state multilevel finite element approach [J].
Martiny, Ph. ;
Lani, F. ;
Kinloch, A. J. ;
Pardoen, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2008, 28 (4-5) :222-236