Potential Impact of "Take the Volume Pledge'' on Access and Outcomes for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery

被引:33
作者
Jacobs, Ryan C. [1 ]
Groth, Shawn [1 ]
Farjah, Farhood [2 ]
Wilson, Mark A. [3 ]
Petersen, Laura A. [4 ,5 ]
Massarweh, Nader N. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, VA HSR&D Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety, Houston, TX USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
cancer resection; health policy; outcome; volume; OPERATIVE MORTALITY; SURGICAL QUALITY; HOSPITAL QUALITY; REGIONALIZATION; ESOPHAGECTOMY; CENTERS; RISK; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002796
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To quantify the number of US hospitals that would meet "Take the Volume Pledge'' (TVP) volume thresholds and compare outcomes at hospitals meeting and not meeting TVP thresholds. Summary Background Data: TVP aims to regionalize complex cancer resections to hospitals meeting established annual average volume thresholds. There is little data describing the potential impact on patient access if this initiative were broadly implemented or the relationship between these volume thresholds and quality of oncologic care. Methods: Hospitals in the National Cancer Database (2006-2012) performing esophagectomy (n = 968), proctectomy (n = 1250), or pancreatectomy (n = 1068) were categorized based on frequency meeting TVP thresholds: always low volume (LV); low annual average and intermittently low volume (ILV); high annual average and intermittently high volume (IHV); always high volume (HV). Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between hospital TVP category, oncologic care processes, and perioperative outcomes. Results: Few hospitals met annual TVP thresholds (HV or IHV)-esophagectomy 1.6%; proctectomy 19.7%; pancreatectomy 6.6%. The majority of esophagectomy (77.8%) and pancreatectomy (53.4%) and 48.1% of proctectomy patients received care at hospitals not meeting annual TVP thresholds (LVor ILV). While performance for all three procedures was generally better at ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals relative to LV hospitals, there were few differences (none of which were consistent) when comparing ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals to each other. Conclusions and Relevance: Few hospitals would meet TVP volume thresholds for complex cancer resections with little difference in outcomes between ILV, IHV, and HV hospitals. While a policy to regionalize complex surgical care may have merit, it could also compromise patient autonomy and limit access to care if patients are unable or unwilling to travel.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1089
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[2]   Regionalization and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Surgery in Ontario, Canada [J].
Bendzsak, Anna M. ;
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Darling, Gail E. ;
Austin, Peter C. ;
Urbach, David R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (24) :2772-+
[3]   Comparison of Commission on Cancer-Approved and -Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data Base [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (25) :4177-4181
[4]   Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[5]   Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Marth, NJ ;
Goodman, DC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (20) :2703-2708
[6]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[7]   Hospital Quality and the Cost of Inpatient Surgery in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, John D. ;
Gust, Cathryn ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O. ;
Skinner, Jonathan S. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (01) :1-5
[8]   Strategies for improving surgical quality - Should payers reward excellence or effort? [J].
Birkmeyer, NJO ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (08) :864-870
[9]   Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? [J].
Bliss, Lindsay A. ;
Yang, Catherine J. ;
Chau, Zeling ;
Ng, Sing Chau ;
McFadden, David W. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Moser, A. James ;
Callery, Mark P. ;
Tseng, Jennifer F. .
HPB, 2014, 16 (10) :899-906
[10]   Readmission destination and risk of mortality after major surgery: an observational cohort study [J].
Brooke, Benjamin S. ;
Goodney, Philip P. ;
Kraiss, Larry W. ;
Gottlieb, Daniel J. ;
Samore, Matthew H. ;
Finlayson, Samuel R. G. .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (9996) :884-895