Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis

被引:27
作者
Bailey, MD
Twa, MD
Mitchell, GL
Dhaliwal, DK
Jones, LA
McMahon, TT
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Eye & Ear, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.040
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of refractive error measurements and the repeatability of axial length (AL) measurements in patients after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Methods: Subjective refraction, autorefraction measurements with the Grand Seiko and Humphrey autorefractors, and AL measurements with the IOLMaster were completed for 40 previously myopic LASIK patients under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions on 2 separate occasions. Results: The mean difference between visits for axial length measurements was 0.008 mm +/- 0.04 (SD). The between visits repeatability for all refractive error measurements were < 0.75 diopter (D). The mean difference between the subjective refraction and the Humphrey autorefractor for spherical equivalent was statistically significant under noncycloplegic conditions (-0.90 D, P <.0001) and cycloplegic conditions (-2.05 D, P <.0001). The mean difference between subjective refraction and Grand Seiko autorefraction measurements was not significant under noncycloplegic conditions (+ 0.05 D, 95% limits of agreement [LoA] = -0.99, 1.09; P = .52) conditions but was statistically significant, but not clinically relevant, under cycloplegic conditions (+ 0.17 D, 95% LoA = -0.73, 1.07; P = .03). Conclusions: Refractive error measurements after LASIK using the Grand Seiko autorefractor are reliable and agree well with subjective refraction measurements. (c) 2005 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1034
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Applegate RA, 2000, J REFRACT SURG, V16, P507
  • [2] Benjamin W, 1998, BORISHS CLIN REFRACT, P559
  • [3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [4] Bullimore MA, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2110
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor
    Davies, LN
    Mallen, EAH
    Wolffsohn, JS
    Gilmartin, B
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (04) : 320 - 324
  • [6] A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children
    Gwiazda, J
    Hyman, L
    Hussein, M
    Everett, D
    Norton, TT
    Kurtz, D
    Leske, MC
    Manny, R
    Marsh-Tootle, W
    Scheiman, M
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 (04) : 1492 - 1500
  • [7] Hong X, 2000, J REFRACT SURG, V16, pS647
  • [8] Autorefraction/autokeratometry and subjective refraction in untreated and photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes
    OyoSzerenyi, KD
    Wienecke, L
    Businger, U
    Schipper, I
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 115 (02) : 157 - 164
  • [9] Rosa N, 2002, J REFRACT SURG, V18, P449
  • [10] Russell G E, 1992, Refract Corneal Surg, V8, P290