Robotic Revisional Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy

被引:5
作者
Qudah, Yaqeen [1 ]
Alhareb, Alia [1 ]
Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S. [1 ]
Del Gobbo, Gabriel Diaz [1 ]
Rodriguez, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kroh, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Corcelles, Ricard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Dept Gen Surg, Abu Dhabi 112412, U Arab Emirates
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gen Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 32卷 / 10期
关键词
revisional surgery; bariatric surgery; robotic surgery; weight loss; SADI-S; DUODENAL SWITCH; BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION; ILEAL BYPASS; STATEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2021.0470
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a metabolic operation emerging as an option for patients with morbid obesity. It is a promising revisional procedure for weight regain or suboptimal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Currently, there is limited literature describing robotic revisional SADI-S. This study describes the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of robotic revisional SADI-S after previous SG. Methods: This is a retrospective review from May 26 2019 to January 31 2021. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 16 patients underwent the procedure. There were 11 females (69%) with a mean age of 39 +/- 11 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.0 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2) and median ASA was two. Comorbidities included hypertension (25%), hyperlipidemia (19%), and obstructive sleep apnea (13%). Mean interval from primary to revisional surgery among patients was 5.5 +/- 1.4 years. Median operative console time was 110 minutes (IQR = 103-137). There were no intraoperative complications. The median hospital stay was 2 days (IQR = 2-3). Perioperative outcomes included no reoperations, perioperative complications, or deaths. There were two (12.5%) emergency department visits for wound checks without infection but no readmissions. At a median follow-up of 4.5 months (IQR = 1-10), patients had a mean BMI of 38.3 +/- 7.3 kg/m(2) and a mean percent total body weight loss (%TBW) of 12.7%. Conclusions: Initial outcomes suggest that robotic revisional SADI-S after previous SG is feasible and safe. Future studies are needed to evaluate intermediate- and long-term postoperative outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1031
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Robotic Duodenal Switch Is Associated with Outcomes Comparable to those of Laparoscopic Approach [J].
Al-Mazrou, Ahmed M. ;
Cruz, Mariana Vigiola ;
Dakin, Gregory ;
Bellorin-Marin, Omar E. ;
Pomp, Alfons ;
Afaneh, Cheguevara .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (05) :2019-2029
[2]   Contribution of Laparoscopic Training to Robotic Proficiency [J].
Angell, Jordan ;
Gomez, Michael S. ;
Baig, Mirza M. ;
Abaza, Ronney .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (08) :1027-1031
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Q2 2020 INTUITIVE IN
[4]   One-stage robotically assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 179 patients [J].
Antanavicius, Gintaras ;
Rezvani, Masoud ;
Sucandy, Iswanto .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (02) :367-371
[5]   Robot-assisted versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is There a Difference in Outcomes? [J].
Ayloo, Subhashini M. ;
Addeo, Pietro ;
Buchs, Nicolas Christian ;
Shah, Galaxy ;
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (03) :637-642
[6]   Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2020 [J].
Brown, Wendy A. ;
de Leon Ballesteros, Guillermo Ponce ;
Ooi, Geraldine ;
Higa, Kelvin ;
Himpens, Jacques ;
Torres, Antonio ;
Shikora, Scott ;
Kow, Lilian ;
Herrera, Miguel F. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (01) :3-25
[7]   Comparison of robotic revisional weight loss surgery and laparoscopic revisional weight loss surgery using the MBSAQIP database [J].
Clapp, Benjamin ;
Liggett, Evan ;
Jones, Robert ;
Lodeiro, Carlos ;
Dodoo, Christopher ;
Tyroch, Alan .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (06) :909-919
[8]   An Analysis of Mid-Term Complications, Weight Loss, and Type 2 Diabetes Resolution of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus-Sparing Surgery (SIPS) Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with Three-Year Follow-Up [J].
Cottam, Austin ;
Cottam, Daniel ;
Zaveri, Hinali ;
Cottam, Samuel ;
Surve, Amit ;
Medlin, Walter ;
Richards, Christina .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (09) :2894-2902
[9]   American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States [J].
English, Wayne J. ;
DeMaria, Eric J. ;
Hutter, Matthew M. ;
Kothari, Shanu N. ;
Mattar, Samer G. ;
Brethauer, Stacy A. ;
Morton, John M. .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (04) :457-463
[10]   Single Versus Double-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Single-Site Comparative Cohort Study in 440 Consecutive Patients [J].
Finno, Pablo ;
Osorio, Javier ;
Garcia-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela, Amador ;
Casajoana, Anna ;
Sorribas, Maria ;
Admella, Victor ;
Serrano, Monica ;
Marchesini, Joao Batista ;
Ramos, Almino C. ;
Pujol-Gebelli, Jordi .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (09) :3309-3316