Metro station evacuation safety assessment considering emergency response

被引：5

作者：

Li, Haiquan ^{[1
]}

Wang, Yan ^{[2
]}

Jiang, Juncheng ^{[1
,3
]}

Zhou, Ru ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Safety Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211816, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Law, Dept Publ Adm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

[3] Changzhou Univ, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Changzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

来源：

SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL | 2022年 / 98卷 / 10期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Metro station; emergency response; evacuation; building capacity; numerical simulation; PEDESTRIAN EVACUATION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SUBWAY STATION; SIMULATION; PASSENGERS; DYNAMICS; STRATEGY; MODELS; MICRO;

D O I：

10.1177/00375497221095071

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

The emergency response process will not start immediately in the initial stage of a subway accident, and information will not fully spread temporarily. Crowds in different regions receive different comprehensiveness of accident information. They will start evacuating at different times and at different desired speed states. Depending on this phenomenon, pedestrians were classified in simulation modeling. In addition, the different states of emergency gates, escalators, and automatic gate machines before and after the emergency response instruction were set up in the simulation. The impact of different emergency response times on evacuations was studied. The emergency response in advance did not make a significant promotion to evacuation efficiency, but delayed emergency response reduced it greatly. This work proposed an evacuation risk index (ERI) and maximum safe evacuation capacity in metro stations. The worst accident evacuation scenario can be obtained by calculating the ERI, and a metro station was evaluated as a case study. The comparison of the evaluation results of ERI and other methods shows that the conclusion is consistent, but ERI considers the accident location factor.

引用

页码：919 / 931

页数：13

共 38 条

[1]

Abdelghany A., 2018, SIMULATION T SCS, V95, P823

[2]

[Anonymous], 2013, GB50157-2013

[3]

[Anonymous], 1989, 100001988 GBT

[4] Multi-Dimensional evacuation risk evaluation in standard subway station [J].

Chen, Junfeng ;

Liu, Chang ;

Meng, Yangyang ;

Zhong, Maohua .

SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 142

[5] Emergency evacuation simulation at starting connection of cross-sea bridge: Case study on Haicang Avenue Subway Station in Xiamen Rail Transit Line [J].

Chen, Yameng ;

Wang, Chen ;

Yap, Jeffrey Boon Hui ;

Li, Heng ;

Zhang, Songjiang .

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2020, 29

[6] Pedestrian Evacuation Risk Assessment of Subway Station under Large-Scale Sport Activity [J].

Cheng, Zeyang ;

Lu, Jian ;

Zhao, Yi .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (11)

[7] Emergency evacuation risk assessment and mitigation strategy for a toxic gas leak in an underground space: The case of a subway station in Guangzhou, China [J].

Feng, Jian Rui ;

Gai, Wen-mei ;

Yan, Ya-bin .

SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 134

[8]

Fleming J., 2000, FIRE ARSON INVESTIGA, V50, P35

[9]

Ge X., 2011, Procedia Eng, V11, P112

[10]

Gwynne S., 2016, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, Vfifth, P2429, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-064, 10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_64, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939]

← 1 2 3 4 →