AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF EXCLUDING THE CATCH PHASE OF THE POWER CLEAN ON FORCE-TIME CHARACTERISTICS DURING ISOMETRIC AND DYNAMIC TASKS: AN INTERVENTION STUDY

被引:31
作者
Comfort, Paul [1 ]
Dos'Santos, Thomas [1 ]
Thomas, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
McMahon, John J. [1 ]
Suchomel, Timothy J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Directorate Sport Exercise & Physiotherapy, Manchester, England
[2] Univ South Wales, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[3] Carroll Univ, Dept Human Movement Sci, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词
countermovement jump; weightlifting; performance; training; KINETIC VARIABLES; MAXIMUM STRENGTH; PULL; PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY; DERIVATIVES; ANGLE; LOAD;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002656
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to compare the effects of the exclusion or inclusion of the catch phase during power clean (PC) derivatives on force-time characteristics during isometric and dynamic tasks, after two 4-week mesocycles of resistance training. Two strength matched groups completed the twice-weekly training sessions either including the catch phase of the PC derivatives (Catch group: n = 16; age 19.3 +/- 2.1 years; height 1.79 +/- 0.08 m; body mass 71.14 +/- 11.79 kg; PC 1 repetition maximum [1RM] 0.93 +/- 0.15 kg.kg(-1)) or excluding the catch phase (Pull group: n = 18; age 19.8 +/- 2.5 years; height 1.73 +/- 0.10 m; body mass 66.43 +/- 10.13 kg; PC 1 RM 0.91 +/- 0.18 kg.kg(-1)). The Catch and Pull groups both demonstrated significant (p <= 0.007, power >= 0.834) and meaningful improvements in countermovement jump height (10.8 +/- 12.3%, 5.2 +/- 9.2%), isometric mid-thigh pull performance (force [F]100: 14.9 +/- 17.2%, 15.5 +/- 16.0%, F150: 16.0 +/- 1 7.6%, 16.2 +/- 18.4%, F200: 15.8 +/- 1 7.6%, 17.9 +/- 18.3%, F250: 10.0 +/- 16.1%,10.9 +/- 14.4%, peak force: 13.7 +/- 18.7%, 9.7 +/- 16.3%), and PC 1RM (9.5 +/- 6.2%, 8.4 +/- 6.1%), before and after intervention, respectively. In contrast to the hypotheses, there were no meaningful or significant differences in the percentage change for any variables between groups. This study clearly demonstrates that neither the inclusion nor exclusion of the catch phase of the PC derivatives results in any preferential adaptations over two 4-week, in-season strength and power, mesocycles.
引用
收藏
页码:2116 / 2129
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J STRENGTH COND RES
[2]  
Baechle T.R., 2008, Resistance training. Essentials of strength and conditioning, P381
[3]  
Beckham G, 2013, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V53, P573
[4]   EFFECT OF BODY POSITION ON FORCE PRODUCTION DURING THE ISOMETRIC MIDTHIGH PULL [J].
Beckham, George K. ;
Sato, Kimitake ;
Santana, Hugo A. P. ;
Mizuguchi, Satoshi ;
Haff, G. Gregory ;
Stone, Michael H. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2018, 32 (01) :48-56
[5]  
Canavan PK., 1996, J STRENGTH COND RES, V10, P127
[6]   A COMPARISON OF CATCH PHASE FORCE-TIME CHARACTERISTICS DURING CLEAN DERIVATIVES FROM THE KNEE [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
Williams, Robert ;
Suchomel, Timothy J. ;
Lake, Jason P. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (07) :1911-1918
[7]   RELIABILITY OF MAXIMAL BACK SQUAT AND POWER CLEAN PERFORMANCES IN INEXPERIENCED ATHLETES [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
McMahon, John J. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (11) :3089-3096
[8]   The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
Jones, Paul A. ;
Udall, Rebecca .
SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 14 (02) :139-156
[9]   Effect of Knee and Trunk Angle on Kinetic Variables During the Isometric Midthigh Pull: Test-Retest Reliability [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
Jones, Paul A. ;
McMahon, John J. ;
Newton, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 10 (01) :58-63
[10]   THE EFFECT OF LOADING ON KINEMATIC AND KINETIC VARIABLES DURING THE MIDTHIGH CLEAN PULL [J].
Comfort, Paul ;
Udall, Rebecca ;
Jones, Paul A. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (05) :1208-1214