Dynamics and causality of oil price shocks on commodities: Quantile-on-quantile and causality-in-quantiles methods

被引:41
作者
Yang, Dong-Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Bi-Bo [3 ]
Tong, Jing-Yang [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Coll Econ & Trade, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Coll Econ & Trade, Changsha 410006, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Inner Mongolia Univ Finance & Econ, Hohhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Natl Inst Int Strategy, Beijing 10007, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Oil shocks; Commodities; Quantile; Causality; CONSISTENT NONPARAMETRIC TEST; COUNTRIES-FRESH-EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH NEXUS; CRUDE-OIL; US DOLLAR; CONSUMING-COUNTRIES; GRANGER-CAUSALITY; VOLATILITY; DEPENDENCE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102246
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We aimed to use rolling quantile regression, quantile-on-quantile, and causality-in-quantiles methods to document the dynamics and causal relationships between oil price shocks and commodities using a dataset from January 1992 to June 2019. The empirical results indicated that the coefficients of the rolling window quantile regression varied over time periods and were most significant for oil supply shock effects on commodities. Furthermore, the causality results showed that oil shocks can provide some predictability for commodities in some quantiles. The quantile-on-quantile analysis revealed that the effects of oil shocks on commodities varied across quantiles and were heterogeneous and asymmetrical. The impact of supply shock on commodities was mainly negative, whereas for aggregate demand shock, the effects were positive in bearish markets. For oil-specific demand shock, a symmetric dependence structure was detected.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Dealing with cost-push inflation in Latin America: multi-causality in a context of increased openness and commodity price volatility [J].
Abeles, Martin ;
Panigo, Demian .
REVIEW OF KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2015, 3 (04) :517-535
[2]   Oil and the macroeconomy: using wavelets to analyze old issues [J].
Aguiar-Conraria, Luis ;
Soares, Maria Joana .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 40 (03) :645-655
[3]   How is volatility in commodity markets linked to oil price shocks? [J].
Ahmadi, Maryam ;
Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri ;
Manera, Matteo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 :11-23
[4]   Volatility forecasting, downside risk, and diversification benefits of Bitcoin and oil and international commodity markets: A comparative analysis with yellow metal [J].
Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed ;
Mensi, Walid ;
Al-Jarrah, Idries Mohammad Wanas ;
Hamdi, Atef ;
Kang, Sang Hoon .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 49 :104-120
[5]   Do exchange rates respond asymmetrically to shocks in the crude oil market? [J].
Atems, Bebonchu ;
Kapper, Devin ;
Lam, Eddery .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 :227-238
[6]   Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus for top 10 natural Gas-Consuming countries: A granger causality analysis in the frequency domain [J].
Aydin, Mucahit .
ENERGY, 2018, 165 :179-186
[7]   Oil spills on other commodities [J].
Baffes, John .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2007, 32 (03) :126-134
[8]   Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Roubaud, David .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 64 :74-81
[9]   Does uncertainty move the gold price? New evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Pierdzioch, Christian .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2016, 49 :74-80
[10]   Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Predict Exchange Rate Returns and Volatility? Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Test [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Kyei, Clement ;
Wohar, Mark E. .
OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2016, 27 (02) :229-250