Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of the Thermal Insulation Improvement in Residential Buildings

被引:5
作者
Cusenza, Maria Anna [1 ]
Gulotta, Teresa Maria [1 ]
Mistretta, Marina [2 ]
Cellura, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Ingn, Viale Sci 9, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Mediterranea Reggio, Dipartimento Patrimonio Architettura Urbanist, I-89124 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy
关键词
building retrofit; thermal insulation; bio-based materials; energy; life cycle assessment; sustainability; SECTOR; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/en14123452
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The refurbishment of the building stock is a key strategy towards the achievement of the climate and energy goals of the European Union. This study aims at evaluating the energy and environmental impacts associated with retrofitting a residential apartment to improve its vertical envelope thermal insulation. Two insulation materials, stone wool and cellulose fibers, are compared. The life cycle assessment methodology is applied assuming 1 m(2) of retrofitted vertical envelope as functional unit. Moreover, to estimate the net energy and environmental benefits achievable in the retrofitted scenario compared with the non-retrofitted one, a second analysis is performed in which the system boundaries are expanded to include the building operational phase, and 1 m(2) of walkable floor per year is assumed as reference. The results show that the use of cellulose fibers involve lower impacts in most of the assessed categories compared to stone wool, except for abiotic resource depletion. In detail, the use of cellulose fibers allows to reduce the impact on climate change up to 20% and the consumption of primary energy up to 10%. The evaluation of the net energy and environmental benefits shows the effectiveness of the retrofit energy policies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SWISS CENT LIFE CYCL
[2]   Building energy performance: A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board [J].
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Mistretta, Marina .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (01) :1-10
[3]   Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldassarri, Catia ;
Fthenakis, Vasilis .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 64 :73-89
[4]  
Baldassarri C., 2017, Consumer Footprint: Basket of Products Indicator on Housing, DOI [10.2760/734672, DOI 10.2760/734672]
[5]   Energy retrofit of a single-family house: Life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits [J].
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Fontana, Mario ;
Longo, Sonia ;
Mistretta, Marina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 :283-293
[6]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review [J].
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Rincon, Lidia ;
Vilarino, Virginia ;
Perez, Gabriel ;
Castell, Albert .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :394-416
[7]   Energy-environmental assessment of the UIA-OpenAgri case study as urban regeneration project through agriculture [J].
Caputo, Paola ;
Zagarella, Federica ;
Cusenza, Maria Anna ;
Mistretta, Marina ;
Cellura, Maurizio .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 729
[8]   Ammonium zeolite and ammonium phosphate applied as fire retardants for microcrystalline cellulose filled thermoplastic composites [J].
Cavdar, Ayfer Donmez ;
Torun, Sevda Boran ;
Ertas, Murat ;
Mengeloglu, Fatih .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2019, 107 :202-209
[9]   Environmental assessment of 2030 electricity generation scenarios in Sicily: An integrated approach [J].
Cusenza, Maria Anna ;
Guarino, Francesco ;
Longo, Sonia ;
Mistretta, Marina ;
Cellura, Maurizio .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 160 :1148-1159
[10]  
DoE US, 2010, REFERENCE ENERGYPLUS