Tibetan herbal pain-relieving plaster for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Yang, Mingxiao [1 ]
Li, Susan Q. [1 ]
Smith, Colleen M. [1 ]
Zhang, Yi Lily [1 ]
Bao, Ting [1 ]
Mao, Jun J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Bendheim Integrat Med Ctr, Dept Med, 1429 First Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Bendheim Integrat Med Ctr, 1429 First Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Low back pain; Tibetan herbal formula; Camphor-based external analgesic; CheeZheng pain-relieving plaster; Efficacy; SHANZHISIDE METHYLESTER; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111727
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Tibetan traditional medicine CheeZheng Pain-Relieving Plaster (CZPRP) is frequently used as an over-the-counter external analgesic for musculoskeletal pain; however, its evidence for low back pain (LBP) has not been evaluated. Aim of the study: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of CZPRP for both acute, subacute and chronic LBP through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Materials and methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, CNKI, CQVIP, and Wanfang databases were searched through April 20, 2020 for randomized controlled trials of CZPRP for LBP. Eligible comparators were placebo, active treatment, or usual care. Clinical outcomes included pain severity, lower back function score, pain-free rate, and adverse events (AEs). Qualitative evaluations were conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. Quantitative analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Results: This study includes 1674 LBP patients from nine clinical studies. Pooled analyses among subjects with acute LBP show 1) significant pain reductions (mean difference -0.84, 95% confidence interval[CI] -1.31, -0.37) in CZPRP plus diclofenac versus diclofenac, 2) significant improvements in lower back function (standard mean difference -1.50, 95% CI -2.16, -0.85) in CZPRP versus diclofenac, and 3) a higher pain-free rate in CZPRP alone (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.16, 1.89; I2 = 61%) or CZPRP plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (risk ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.14, 2.40; I2 = 0%) versus NSAIDs. However, in a heterogeneous population with mixed LBP subtypes, there was no significant difference in pain outcomes between CZPRP and diclofenac. Additionally, CZPRP use did not increase AEs compared with no CZPRP (p = 0.40). All nine studies are associated with moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusions: The use of CZPRP is associated with improved acute LBP outcomes compared to diclofenac. However, due to the moderate to high risk of bias of the studies, future rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effects of CZPRP for acute and chronic LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BMJ, V366, P4898
[2]   Non-specific low back pain [J].
Balague, Federico ;
Mannion, Anne F. ;
Pellise, Ferran ;
Cedraschi, Christine .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814) :482-491
[3]   A Systematic Review of CheeZheng Pain Relieving Plaster for Musculoskeletal Pain: Implications for Oncology Research and Practice [J].
Chen, Connie ;
Li, Susan Q. ;
Bao, Ting ;
Zhang, Lily ;
Seluzicki, Christina ;
Mao, Jun J. .
INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2020, 19
[4]   How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews [J].
Cho, Hyun-Woo ;
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung ;
Lim, Byungmook ;
Heo, Kwang-Ho ;
Liu, Jian-Ping ;
Tsutani, Kiichiro ;
Lee, Myeong Soo ;
Shin, Byung-Cheul .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[5]   Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Snow, Vincenza ;
Casey, Donald ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Owens, Douglas K. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :478-491
[6]   Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J].
Cieza, Alarcos ;
Causey, Kate ;
Kamenov, Kaloyan ;
Hanson, Sarah Wulf ;
Chatterji, Somnath ;
Vos, Theo .
LANCET, 2020, 396 (10267) :2006-2017
[7]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[8]   Mechanisms of Topical Analgesics in Relieving Pain in an Animal Model of Muscular Inflammation [J].
Duan, Wan-Ru ;
Lu, Jie ;
Xie, Yi-Kuan .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (09) :1381-1387
[9]   Shanzhiside methylester, the principle effective iridoid glycoside from the analgesic herb Lamiophlomis rotata, reduces neuropathic pain by stimulating spinal microglial β-endorphin expression [J].
Fan, Hui ;
Li, Teng-Fei ;
Gong, Nian ;
Wang, Yong-Xiang .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 101 :98-109
[10]   A new anti-fibrinolytic hemostatic compound 8-O-acetyl shanzhiside methylester extracted from Lamiophlomis rotata [J].
Fan, Peng-Cheng ;
Ma, Hui-Ping ;
Hao, Ying ;
He, Xi-Rui ;
Sun, Ai-Jun ;
Jiang, Wei ;
Li, Mao-Xing ;
Jing, Lin-Lin ;
He, Lei ;
Ma, Jun ;
Jia, Zheng-Ping .
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 187 :232-238