A Systematic Review of Energy Efficiency Home Retrofit Evaluation Studies

被引:7
作者
Giandomenico, Lauren [1 ]
Papineau, Maya [2 ]
Rivers, Nicholas [3 ]
机构
[1] Smart Prosper Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Dept Econ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Grad Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
energy efficiency; residential energy consumption; retrofit programs; systematic review; program evaluation; CONSERVATION PROGRAMS; ELECTRICITY SAVINGS; AUDIT PREDICTIONS; POLICY; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; BECA;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-124353
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We systematically review studies evaluating the energy savings and cost-effectiveness of residential energy efficiency retrofit programs. We review 39 evaluations of 23 residential retrofit programs that were evaluated between 1984 and 2021. Our sample is restricted to program evaluations that used postretrofit household energy billing or consumption data from 140,977 retrofitted households. We report four primary findings. First, none of the studies in our sample reported deep energy savings (e.g., 50% or greater) from retrofit programs. The mean reduction in measured electricity and/or fuel consumption due to energy efficiency retrofits for all programs included in our sample was roughly 7.2%. However, because many households use both fuel and electricity, total household energy savings from the retrofit programs evaluated in our sample are probably smaller. Second, reported program savings decreased as the internal validity of study design increased. Third, as measured by realized savings and cost-effectiveness, the most promising retrofits were insulation and programmable thermostats, whereas the least promising retrofits were storm windows and doors. Fourth, programs with high reported savings and low costs of conserved energy served low-income, fuel-heated households exclusively.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 708
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A critical review of energy retrofitting trends in residential buildings with particular focus on the GCC countries [J].
Ahmed, Wahhaj ;
Asif, Muhammad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 144
[2]  
Allcott H., 2017, Measuring the Welfare Effects of Residential Energy Efficiency Programs, DOI [10.3386/w23386, DOI 10.3386/W23386]
[3]   Tagging and Targeting of Energy Efficiency Subsidies [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Knittel, Christopher ;
Taubinsky, Dmitry .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (05) :187-191
[4]   Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation A Systematic Review of Non-price Interventions and Their Causal Effects [J].
Andor, Mark A. ;
Fels, Katja M. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 148 :178-210
[5]  
Barr M, 2008, REPORT IMPACTS COSTS
[6]  
Bell CJ, 2012, ENERGY EFFICIENCY JO, P19
[7]  
Berry L, 1983, EVAL PROGR PLAN, V6, P121
[8]   DETERMINANTS OF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS - RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL WEATHERIZATION EVALUATION [J].
BROWN, MA ;
BERRY, LG .
ENERGY, 1995, 20 (08) :729-743
[9]   ENERGY SAVINGS OF WATER-HEATER RETROFITS - EVIDENCE FROM HOOD RIVER [J].
BROWN, MA ;
WHITE, DL ;
PURUCKER, SL .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 1989, 13 (01) :51-61
[10]   EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF 2 ENERGY-CONSERVATION PROGRAMS IN A MIDWESTERN CITY [J].
BROWN, MA ;
MACEY, SM .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 1985, 5 (01) :39-53